1.5 sec in total
48 ms
1.3 sec
215 ms
Welcome to jmp.com homepage info - get ready to check Jmp best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about jmp.com
Statistics and DOE software for Mac and Windows. Interactive, visual statistical data analysis from SAS.
Visit jmp.comWe analyzed Jmp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
jmp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value4.8 s
68/100
10%
Value2,300 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
48 ms
39 ms
124 ms
140 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Jmp.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Sas.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (296 ms) belongs to the original domain Jmp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (53%)
4.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Jmp.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 171.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 57.5 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 223.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jmp needs image optimization as it can save up to 223.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 325.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (55%)
69
31
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jmp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jmp.com
48 ms
home.html
39 ms
satelliteLib-4ca9883ec03349d8552b3a256cb2aae58b6a4667.js
124 ms
jquery.js
140 ms
shared.js
55 ms
main.js
30 ms
modernizr.js
33 ms
modal.js
47 ms
accordion_wrapper.js
62 ms
geotarget.js
57 ms
forms.js
49 ms
cookie.js
59 ms
foundation_head.js
63 ms
static.css
84 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
87 ms
user-profiles-min.2.0.js
69 ms
librarymanager.js
69 ms
swipejs.js
85 ms
static.min.js
66 ms
sascom.js
74 ms
foundation_foot.js
85 ms
SASCXA.js
86 ms
ot_async.js
97 ms
liveperson.js
100 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
dc.js
40 ms
147 ms
shared.css
38 ms
shared.css
36 ms
jquery-ui.js
70 ms
jcarousel.css
36 ms
jcarousel.js
36 ms
personalization.js
57 ms
default.css
61 ms
default.css
56 ms
1427124539205.png
65 ms
1427124537430.png
58 ms
1409232424972.png
67 ms
1412176245175.png
132 ms
1408595513213.png
127 ms
1412175788666.png
131 ms
1430502036437.jpg
136 ms
1427124538382.png
137 ms
1418678877622.png
134 ms
1430501964960.png
133 ms
1420728554112.png
134 ms
1418308578772.png
137 ms
1412369034183.png
139 ms
1418216880953.png
141 ms
1444843626856.jpg
141 ms
1426706593117.jpg
142 ms
1454618724346.jpg
144 ms
1454610002470.jpg
145 ms
1426708051528.jpg
145 ms
1426708124473.jpg
146 ms
1454609984669.jpg
147 ms
1452285988667.jpg
149 ms
1426708140395.jpg
149 ms
1444414126726.jpg
150 ms
1422565456337.png
151 ms
__utm.gif
75 ms
1427124537430.png
113 ms
1427124539205.png
138 ms
1409232424972.png
104 ms
1408595513213.png
137 ms
jmp-branding-sprite.png
52 ms
1412175788666.png
144 ms
1412176245175.png
142 ms
1430501964960.png
80 ms
1418678877622.png
141 ms
1420728554112.png
146 ms
1430502036437.jpg
138 ms
1427124538382.png
138 ms
1418308578772.png
138 ms
1412369034183.png
296 ms
1418216880953.png
291 ms
1444843626856.jpg
289 ms
1426706593117.jpg
292 ms
1454618724346.jpg
289 ms
1454610002470.jpg
290 ms
1426708051528.jpg
290 ms
1426708124473.jpg
287 ms
1454609984669.jpg
287 ms
1452285988667.jpg
287 ms
1426708140395.jpg
287 ms
1444414126726.jpg
285 ms
1422565456337.png
284 ms
bb495831-ebf7-4423-9a14-ee11bf6b292f.woff
55 ms
sasicons-41615.woff
271 ms
session.js
212 ms
JavascriptInsert.js
219 ms
uz_feed.js
155 ms
trackingCode.js
162 ms
satellite-568c0c6564746d234a005224.js
158 ms
47 ms
b4199f62-4009-46e6-9359-5c262251c962.woff
33 ms
voc.js
9 ms
notice
168 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
jmp.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jmp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
jmp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Jmp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jmp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jmp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: