Tools & Wizards About Us
jmrolph.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

jmrolph.com

J. M. Rolph Pickups and Rewinding Service

Page Load Speed

419 ms in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

213 ms

Page Rendered

93 ms

jmrolph.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jmrolph.com homepage info - get ready to check J M Rolph best content right away, or after learning these important things about jmrolph.com

If you've been waiting for that special sound, visit our page.

Visit jmrolph.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jmrolph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 306 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jmrolph.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jmrolph.com

113 ms

pickups.gif

48 ms

special.gif

46 ms

search.gif

47 ms

links.gif

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Jmrolph.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (113 ms) belongs to the original domain Jmrolph.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.5 kB (82%)

Content Size

11.6 kB

After Optimization

2.1 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Jmrolph.com main page is 11.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 11.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 11.6 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of J M Rolph. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

jmrolph.com

jmrolph.com

113 ms

pickups.gif

pickups.gif

48 ms

special.gif

special.gif

46 ms

search.gif

search.gif

47 ms

links.gif

links.gif

45 ms

mail.gif

mail.gif

66 ms

jmrolph.gif

jmrolph.gif

45 ms

up.gif

up.gif

75 ms

Count.cgi

Count.cgi

85 ms

wjdrake.gif

wjdrake.gif

78 ms

Accessibility Review

jmrolph.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

jmrolph.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jmrolph.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmrolph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jmrolph.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

jmrolph.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of J M Rolph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: