12.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
7.6 sec
3.5 sec
Visit jobtick.com now to see the best up-to-date Jobtick content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jobtick.com
Visit jobtick.com for a handyman, cleaning, removals, delivery, computer & tech services and anything else in Australia
Visit jobtick.comWe analyzed Jobtick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
jobtick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
42/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
1572 ms
108 ms
1346 ms
758 ms
1003 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Jobtick.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Jobtick.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (83%)
1.8 MB
313.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Jobtick.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 459 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jobtick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 158 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)
46
20
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jobtick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jobtick.com
1572 ms
gtm.js
108 ms
0c6907854cb28cde.css
1346 ms
12045d18562f4a3b.css
758 ms
polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js
1003 ms
webpack-f5db58408308d305.js
748 ms
framework-4975f770e34de116.js
1388 ms
main-fe3faf0e62f6ce39.js
1552 ms
_app-f839a4beb4520e12.js
2033 ms
75fc9c18-404bbd6c974a5ba8.js
1824 ms
ea88be26-7b8f7934ef703100.js
2249 ms
58106135-972dd10d57a1d55f.js
2366 ms
842-fc89407b292e9d5e.js
2382 ms
464-fedca098383e2e4e.js
2076 ms
561-c9fd847dac0960a8.js
2867 ms
index-928c064c73fb8eba.js
3542 ms
_buildManifest.js
2738 ms
_ssgManifest.js
3018 ms
_middlewareManifest.js
3560 ms
line.svg
3544 ms
3674 ms
3877 ms
ea1ff46f3c0f4c6ccbc336343ba7e4f6
94 ms
email-decode.min.js
2982 ms
3813 ms
3816 ms
3816 ms
optimize.js
177 ms
hotjar-2745321.js
182 ms
analytics.js
77 ms
conversion_async.js
165 ms
fbevents.js
48 ms
stat.js
161 ms
js
69 ms
676930946799371
208 ms
155 ms
collect
46 ms
modules.bcd9ade6b0bb9bdd0789.js
42 ms
hero-image-mobile.svg
4181 ms
hero-image.svg
4359 ms
collect
37 ms
ga-audiences
46 ms
17 ms
mapbox-gl.css
48 ms
Flesh.png
3005 ms
testimonial-bg.svg
3080 ms
Mulish-Regular.0dce1097.woff
3427 ms
Mulish-Medium.c54fcb5d.woff
3621 ms
Mulish-Light.59f8ca16.woff
4008 ms
Mulish-ExtraLight.144bb02b.woff
4290 ms
Mulish-SemiBold.2f159464.woff
4234 ms
Mulish-Bold.41cf0470.woff
4497 ms
Mulish-ExtraBold.d120c92f.woff
4696 ms
Mulish-Black.56ab14fe.woff
4819 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
24 ms
jobtick.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jobtick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jobtick.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jobtick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jobtick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jobtick.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jobtick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: