Tools & Wizards About Us
jocktodoc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

jocktodoc.com

Dr Mark Adickes | Orthopedic Surgeon Houston | Sports Medicine Houston

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

970 ms

Page Rendered

636 ms

jocktodoc.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jocktodoc.com homepage info - get ready to check Jocktodoc best content right away, or after learning these important things about jocktodoc.com

Dr Mark Adickes is an orthopedic surgeon and sports medicine specialist in Houston, Texas. He specializes in the treatment of knee, shoulder and hip injuries.

Visit jocktodoc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jocktodoc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jocktodoc.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.27

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jocktodoc.com

50 ms

jocktodoc.com

38 ms

www.jocktodoc.com

172 ms

js

187 ms

gtm.js

311 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Jocktodoc.com, 59% (39 requests) were made to Assets.yourpractice.online and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (510 ms) relates to the external source Assets.yourpractice.online.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 314.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jocktodoc.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 285.6 kB

  • Original 357.4 kB
  • After minification 346.5 kB
  • After compression 71.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 285.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jocktodoc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 17.3 kB
  • After minification 17.3 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (9%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jocktodoc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jocktodoc.com

jocktodoc.com

50 ms

jocktodoc.com

jocktodoc.com

38 ms

www.jocktodoc.com

www.jocktodoc.com

172 ms

js

js

187 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

311 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

120 ms

script.js

script.js

307 ms

call-head.png

call-head.png

292 ms

appoint-head.png

appoint-head.png

259 ms

banner1-bg.jpg

banner1-bg.jpg

420 ms

banner2-bg.jpg

banner2-bg.jpg

421 ms

banner3-bg.jpg

banner3-bg.jpg

420 ms

banner4-bg.jpg

banner4-bg.jpg

419 ms

banner5-bg.jpg

banner5-bg.jpg

420 ms

miss-bg.png

miss-bg.png

259 ms

learn-more.png

learn-more.png

260 ms

abtdr-bg.jpg

abtdr-bg.jpg

417 ms

abtdr-r-bg.jpg

abtdr-r-bg.jpg

494 ms

view-info.png

view-info.png

493 ms

knee-surgery.jpg

knee-surgery.jpg

496 ms

shpulder-surgery.jpg

shpulder-surgery.jpg

494 ms

hip-surgery.jpg

hip-surgery.jpg

495 ms

stem-cell.jpg

stem-cell.jpg

492 ms

rosa-robot.jpg

rosa-robot.jpg

497 ms

sports-med-bg.jpg

sports-med-bg.jpg

500 ms

sports-med-l-bg.jpg

sports-med-l-bg.jpg

496 ms

sports-med-r-bg.jpg

sports-med-r-bg.jpg

499 ms

review-bg.jpg

review-bg.jpg

497 ms

review-l-bg.jpg

review-l-bg.jpg

500 ms

review-r-bg.jpg

review-r-bg.jpg

505 ms

patient-sprit.png

patient-sprit.png

506 ms

mapbg.jpg

mapbg.jpg

505 ms

map-l-bg.jpg

map-l-bg.jpg

510 ms

www.jocktodoc.com

www.jocktodoc.com

130 ms

ypo-logo.png

ypo-logo.png

251 ms

WorkSans-Medium.woff

WorkSans-Medium.woff

145 ms

WorkSans-Regular.woff

WorkSans-Regular.woff

158 ms

WorkSans-Light.woff

WorkSans-Light.woff

158 ms

WorkSans-ExtraLight.woff

WorkSans-ExtraLight.woff

160 ms

WorkSans-Thin.woff

WorkSans-Thin.woff

161 ms

WorkSans-SemiBold.woff

WorkSans-SemiBold.woff

161 ms

WorkSans-ExtraBold.woff

WorkSans-ExtraBold.woff

159 ms

WorkSans-Bold.woff

WorkSans-Bold.woff

161 ms

WorkSans-Black.woff

WorkSans-Black.woff

160 ms

Muli-Light.woff

Muli-Light.woff

162 ms

Muli-Regular.woff

Muli-Regular.woff

161 ms

Muli-SemiBold.woff

Muli-SemiBold.woff

161 ms

Muli-ExtraBold.woff

Muli-ExtraBold.woff

161 ms

Muli-Bold.woff

Muli-Bold.woff

160 ms

Muli-Black.woff

Muli-Black.woff

162 ms

lazysizes-min.js

lazysizes-min.js

153 ms

bullet-w.gif

bullet-w.gif

143 ms

banner1-l-bg.jpg

banner1-l-bg.jpg

200 ms

banner1-r-bg.jpg

banner1-r-bg.jpg

192 ms

banner2-l-bg.jpg

banner2-l-bg.jpg

316 ms

banner2-r-bg.jpg

banner2-r-bg.jpg

214 ms

banner3-l-bg.jpg

banner3-l-bg.jpg

251 ms

banner3-r-bg.jpg

banner3-r-bg.jpg

253 ms

banner4-l-bg.jpg

banner4-l-bg.jpg

270 ms

banner4-r-bg.jpg

banner4-r-bg.jpg

296 ms

banner5-l-bg.jpg

banner5-l-bg.jpg

315 ms

banner5-r-bg.jpg

banner5-r-bg.jpg

345 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

60 ms

banner-mark-adickes-md.png

banner-mark-adickes-md.png

3 ms

joc-to-doc-logo.png

joc-to-doc-logo.png

137 ms

mark-adickes-md-logo.png

mark-adickes-md-logo.png

165 ms

Accessibility Review

jocktodoc.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jocktodoc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jocktodoc.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jocktodoc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jocktodoc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jocktodoc.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jocktodoc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: