Tools & Wizards About Us
jodiscottcoaching.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

jodiscottcoaching.com

Contact Support

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

378 ms

jodiscottcoaching.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jodiscottcoaching.com homepage info - get ready to check Jodiscottcoaching best content right away, or after learning these important things about jodiscottcoaching.com

Visit jodiscottcoaching.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jodiscottcoaching.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jodiscottcoaching.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.211

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jodiscottcoaching.com

285 ms

1249 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

style.min.css

268 ms

utilities.css

272 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Jodiscottcoaching.com, 31% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jodiscottcoaching.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 454.2 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jodiscottcoaching.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 53.2 kB
  • After minification 51.5 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 340.8 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jodiscottcoaching needs image optimization as it can save up to 340.8 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 131.3 kB
  • After minification 131.3 kB
  • After compression 99.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 151.7 kB
  • After minification 151.6 kB
  • After compression 111.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jodiscottcoaching.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (71%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jodiscottcoaching. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jodiscottcoaching.com

jodiscottcoaching.com

285 ms

1249 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

268 ms

utilities.css

utilities.css

272 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

267 ms

style.css

style.css

358 ms

style.css

style.css

228 ms

choices.min.css

choices.min.css

303 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

375 ms

utilities.js

utilities.js

405 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

422 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

356 ms

et-divi-customizer-global-17080760156354.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global-17080760156354.min.css

374 ms

css

css

55 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

502 ms

logo.png

logo.png

90 ms

Web-header-option-6.png

Web-header-option-6.png

90 ms

Web-Header-Text-2.png

Web-Header-Text-2.png

162 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

193 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

24 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

33 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

41 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

44 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf

44 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf

44 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf

44 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf

54 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf

54 ms

Web-header-option-6.png

Web-header-option-6.png

616 ms

Web-Header-Text-2.png

Web-Header-Text-2.png

129 ms

Accessibility Review

jodiscottcoaching.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jodiscottcoaching.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

jodiscottcoaching.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jodiscottcoaching.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jodiscottcoaching.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jodiscottcoaching.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jodiscottcoaching. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: