Tools & Wizards About Us
joesmith.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

joesmith.me

Joseph M. Smith | Portfolio

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

434 ms

joesmith.me screenshot

About Website

Visit joesmith.me now to see the best up-to-date Joe Smith content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joesmith.me

Joseph M. Smith - Sr. Software Engineer & Founder of Oathtrack | Resume and Portfolio

Visit joesmith.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Joesmith.me page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joesmith.me performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.203

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joesmith.me

41 ms

ded51ps4gbe13.cloudfront.net

31 ms

css

44 ms

bootstrap.min.css

113 ms

font-awesome.min.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Joesmith.me, 86% (62 requests) were made to Ded51ps4gbe13.cloudfront.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (589 ms) relates to the external source Ded51ps4gbe13.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 278.9 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Joesmith.me main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 42.8 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.9 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 217.1 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joe Smith needs image optimization as it can save up to 217.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 248.0 kB
  • After minification 247.8 kB
  • After compression 239.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 122.9 kB
  • After minification 122.8 kB
  • After compression 112.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joesmith.me has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (71%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joe Smith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

joesmith.me

joesmith.me

41 ms

ded51ps4gbe13.cloudfront.net

ded51ps4gbe13.cloudfront.net

31 ms

css

css

44 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

113 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

85 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

119 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

81 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

121 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

142 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

133 ms

theme.css

theme.css

199 ms

theme-elements.css

theme-elements.css

217 ms

theme-blog.css

theme-blog.css

168 ms

theme-shop.css

theme-shop.css

175 ms

settings.css

settings.css

203 ms

layers.css

layers.css

265 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

240 ms

skin-resume.css

skin-resume.css

282 ms

demo-resume.css

demo-resume.css

311 ms

custom.css

custom.css

239 ms

headshot_new.jpg

headshot_new.jpg

432 ms

mouse.png

mouse.png

302 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

toastr.min.css

toastr.min.css

31 ms

toastr.min.js

toastr.min.js

41 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

428 ms

jquery.appear.min.js

jquery.appear.min.js

426 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

431 ms

jquery-cookie.min.js

jquery-cookie.min.js

431 ms

style.switcher.js

style.switcher.js

432 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

434 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

459 ms

jquery.validation.min.js

jquery.validation.min.js

433 ms

jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js

jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js

433 ms

jquery.gmap.min.js

jquery.gmap.min.js

458 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

485 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

546 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

482 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

470 ms

vide.min.js

vide.min.js

562 ms

theme.js

theme.js

523 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

589 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

504 ms

view.contact.js

view.contact.js

488 ms

demo-resume.js

demo-resume.js

463 ms

theme.init.js

theme.init.js

524 ms

style.switcher.localstorage.js

style.switcher.localstorage.js

526 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

512 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

459 ms

responsive_devices.png

responsive_devices.png

505 ms

Oathtrack_logo.png

Oathtrack_logo.png

532 ms

AM.png

AM.png

494 ms

FDG.png

FDG.png

509 ms

RHCP.png

RHCP.png

481 ms

logo_app.webp

logo_app.webp

421 ms

ResidentApp.webp

ResidentApp.webp

399 ms

chat.webp

chat.webp

385 ms

Oathtrack_app.png

Oathtrack_app.png

400 ms

flags.png

flags.png

447 ms

contact-bg-1.jpg

contact-bg-1.jpg

336 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

172 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

179 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

188 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

195 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

196 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

437 ms

Simple-Line-Iconsb26c.ttf

Simple-Line-Iconsb26c.ttf

436 ms

style-switcher.css

style-switcher.css

333 ms

bootstrap-colorpicker.css

bootstrap-colorpicker.css

342 ms

bootstrap-colorpicker.min.js

bootstrap-colorpicker.min.js

424 ms

cssbeautify.js

cssbeautify.js

423 ms

less.js

less.js

47 ms

Accessibility Review

joesmith.me accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

joesmith.me best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

joesmith.me SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joesmith.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Joesmith.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

joesmith.me

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joe Smith. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: