Tools & Wizards About Us
jogger.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

jogger.co.in

Jogger - Best PU Footwear Brand in India | Quality | Reliable

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

561 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

283 ms

jogger.co.in screenshot

About Website

Visit jogger.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Jogger content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jogger.co.in

Jogger ISO-9001-2015 quality Footwear. Whether the footwear is in India or abroad, Jogger stands apart as an international quality product.

Visit jogger.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Jogger.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 561 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jogger.co.in performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value42.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value56,950 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.63

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value75.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jogger.co.in

561 ms

6f867b613ee1437741e6b2d3f36626a1.css

182 ms

fa2c5ac7db22777096218797efc03293.css

43 ms

3d92b9398cfd59234c4e19aeb3183dab.css

61 ms

02e13ae30f6cd82eb6df657864a51d42.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Jogger.co.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Jogger.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.0 kB (29%)

Content Size

483.7 kB

After Optimization

344.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jogger.co.in main page is 483.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 278.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 138.8 kB

  • Original 167.3 kB
  • After minification 167.2 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jogger images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 34.8 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 86 B

  • Original 278.8 kB
  • After minification 278.8 kB
  • After compression 278.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jogger.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (80%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jogger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jogger.co.in

jogger.co.in

561 ms

6f867b613ee1437741e6b2d3f36626a1.css

6f867b613ee1437741e6b2d3f36626a1.css

182 ms

fa2c5ac7db22777096218797efc03293.css

fa2c5ac7db22777096218797efc03293.css

43 ms

3d92b9398cfd59234c4e19aeb3183dab.css

3d92b9398cfd59234c4e19aeb3183dab.css

61 ms

02e13ae30f6cd82eb6df657864a51d42.css

02e13ae30f6cd82eb6df657864a51d42.css

160 ms

95cda0d0d7497668d9d802ca56692080.css

95cda0d0d7497668d9d802ca56692080.css

183 ms

0708e3047e454676bb721cd2a50a5a89.css

0708e3047e454676bb721cd2a50a5a89.css

161 ms

0aec198da6814bb718e3ab9259763534.css

0aec198da6814bb718e3ab9259763534.css

178 ms

9cd4c9968914cd17bf11954d8aa968c4.css

9cd4c9968914cd17bf11954d8aa968c4.css

322 ms

bbd614d7662368140ef9476fd97bf214.css

bbd614d7662368140ef9476fd97bf214.css

468 ms

61c7d3ec692f8021bbfb528cd68c7efc.css

61c7d3ec692f8021bbfb528cd68c7efc.css

455 ms

a84ff4756f1d5efae6c7bda0d4062bc5.css

a84ff4756f1d5efae6c7bda0d4062bc5.css

308 ms

c82a814fca0e959141ae24b9b15499db.css

c82a814fca0e959141ae24b9b15499db.css

2754 ms

4903120fbf1e76627e3249c145fc158f.css

4903120fbf1e76627e3249c145fc158f.css

192 ms

4500b14f3728d533201e7ef5f8f2df73.css

4500b14f3728d533201e7ef5f8f2df73.css

437 ms

533639b6dae3a1df6958b1d07411d533.css

533639b6dae3a1df6958b1d07411d533.css

526 ms

de1fad27e6fdf5b9645e26ee1100a968.css

de1fad27e6fdf5b9645e26ee1100a968.css

522 ms

3a18bad64da928f6c1f6c0514c361dde.css

3a18bad64da928f6c1f6c0514c361dde.css

521 ms

a23c04b1959c39a204e276a20fa04213.css

a23c04b1959c39a204e276a20fa04213.css

449 ms

dc6a2ef4d487582835b333f392f2635e.css

dc6a2ef4d487582835b333f392f2635e.css

527 ms

de56fd9ed26c482260e00bc12837df49.css

de56fd9ed26c482260e00bc12837df49.css

528 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

510 ms

svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg'%20viewBox%3D'0%200%20200%20150'%2F%3E

svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg'%20viewBox%3D'0%200%20200%20150'%2F%3E

2908 ms

empty_box.png

empty_box.png

149 ms

BG_1.png

BG_1.png

150 ms

Linearicons.woff

Linearicons.woff

416 ms

667aabccb04ffc2c60e910d47654b223.css

667aabccb04ffc2c60e910d47654b223.css

162 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

191 ms

Accessibility Review

jogger.co.in accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jogger.co.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jogger.co.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jogger.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jogger.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jogger.co.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jogger. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: