Tools & Wizards About Us
joggingjogging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

joggingjogging.com

JoggingJogging - Concept and fashion store in Marseille

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

738 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

768 ms

joggingjogging.com screenshot

About Website

Visit joggingjogging.com now to see the best up-to-date Jogging content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joggingjogging.com

Jogging is a concept store combining fashion, culinary arts, grocery, bed and breakfast, design, lifestyle ...

Visit joggingjogging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joggingjogging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 738 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joggingjogging.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,910 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

738 ms

theme-aa57f3814.css

496 ms

js

60 ms

post-2-4.css

311 ms

post-1-4.css

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Joggingjogging.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Joggingjogging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.2 kB (1%)

Content Size

11.0 MB

After Optimization

10.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Joggingjogging.com main page is 11.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 69.6 kB

  • Original 83.0 kB
  • After minification 75.7 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 649 B

  • Original 10.2 MB
  • After minification 10.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jogging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 553.8 kB
  • After minification 553.4 kB
  • After compression 537.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 958 B

  • Original 169.2 kB
  • After minification 169.2 kB
  • After compression 168.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joggingjogging.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (78%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jogging . We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

738 ms

theme-aa57f3814.css

theme-aa57f3814.css

496 ms

js

js

60 ms

post-2-4.css

post-2-4.css

311 ms

post-1-4.css

post-1-4.css

312 ms

post-3-4.css

post-3-4.css

313 ms

post-10-4.css

post-10-4.css

323 ms

core.js

core.js

507 ms

theme.js

theme.js

529 ms

ps_emailsubscription.js

ps_emailsubscription.js

317 ms

mailalerts.js

mailalerts.js

327 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

relatedproducts.js

relatedproducts.js

329 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

507 ms

toastr.min.js

toastr.min.js

507 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

566 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

527 ms

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

536 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

537 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

571 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

636 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

635 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

645 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

647 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

653 ms

countdown.min.js

countdown.min.js

854 ms

axps-widgets.min.js

axps-widgets.min.js

728 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

742 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

746 ms

kb_front.js

kb_front.js

760 ms

slick.js

slick.js

765 ms

booking_quick_view.js

booking_quick_view.js

833 ms

fabfacebookpixel_3.4.3.js

fabfacebookpixel_3.4.3.js

850 ms

fabfacebookpixel_modules_3.4.3.js

fabfacebookpixel_modules_3.4.3.js

851 ms

qdp.js

qdp.js

872 ms

front.js

front.js

873 ms

printpixel.js

printpixel.js

947 ms

front.js

front.js

955 ms

front.js

front.js

961 ms

front.js

front.js

754 ms

easy-zoom.min.js

easy-zoom.min.js

767 ms

zoom.js

zoom.js

774 ms

jquery.autocomplete.min.js

jquery.autocomplete.min.js

837 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

760 ms

shoppingcart.js

shoppingcart.js

761 ms

jquery.tooltips.min.js

jquery.tooltips.min.js

760 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

81 ms

3f1469daa4f794b7fd1cc9d9c.js

3f1469daa4f794b7fd1cc9d9c.js

177 ms

global.min.js

global.min.js

584 ms

front.js

front.js

590 ms

custom.js

custom.js

666 ms

sweetalert2.js

sweetalert2.js

676 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

59 ms

quantity_limit.js

quantity_limit.js

660 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

824 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

976 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

781 ms

la-solid-900.woff

la-solid-900.woff

928 ms

la-regular-400.woff

la-regular-400.woff

735 ms

la-brands-400.woff

la-brands-400.woff

771 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

766 ms

Home-3.jpg

Home-3.jpg

1051 ms

Home-femme-230724.jpg

Home-femme-230724.jpg

976 ms

home-homme.jpg

home-homme.jpg

1061 ms

Home-journal.jpg

Home-journal.jpg

1090 ms

Samena.jpg

Samena.jpg

1355 ms

Le-Corbusier.jpg

Le-Corbusier.jpg

1565 ms

begum-mule-metallic-nappa-white.png

begum-mule-metallic-nappa-white.png

1066 ms

PHOTO-2024-03-04-09-58-03.png

PHOTO-2024-03-04-09-58-03.png

1138 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

987 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1066 ms

icon_jogging.svg

icon_jogging.svg

1057 ms

Accessibility Review

joggingjogging.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

joggingjogging.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

joggingjogging.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joggingjogging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joggingjogging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

joggingjogging.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jogging . This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: