Tools & Wizards About Us
johncardinal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

johncardinal.com

JohnCardinal.com

Page Load Speed

454 ms in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

212 ms

Page Rendered

142 ms

johncardinal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing John Cardinal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johncardinal.com

Home page for John Cardinal, genealogy software developer and researcher

Visit johncardinal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Johncardinal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 354 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

johncardinal.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

johncardinal.com

100 ms

globals.css

30 ms

common.js

57 ms

quote.js

58 ms

scripts.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Johncardinal.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (100 ms) belongs to the original domain Johncardinal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.1 kB (69%)

Content Size

16.1 kB

After Optimization

5.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Johncardinal.com main page is 16.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 7.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 62% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 7.2 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johncardinal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of John Cardinal. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

johncardinal.com

johncardinal.com

100 ms

globals.css

globals.css

30 ms

common.js

common.js

57 ms

quote.js

quote.js

58 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

59 ms

rss.gif

rss.gif

33 ms

Accessibility Review

johncardinal.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

johncardinal.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

johncardinal.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johncardinal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Johncardinal.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

johncardinal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of John Cardinal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: