2.3 sec in total
388 ms
1.5 sec
425 ms
Welcome to johnjstanton.com homepage info - get ready to check Johnjstanton best content right away, or after learning these important things about johnjstanton.com
At The Law Office of John J. Stanton in Fullerton, we are focused on serving the estate planning and family law needs of our community. Call 714-947-8941.
Visit johnjstanton.comWe analyzed Johnjstanton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
johnjstanton.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value1.9 s
97/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
388 ms
185 ms
281 ms
191 ms
199 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Johnjstanton.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Attorneys.findlaw.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (533 ms) belongs to the original domain Johnjstanton.com.
Page size can be reduced by 138.5 kB (40%)
346.1 kB
207.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Johnjstanton.com main page is 346.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 150.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnjstanton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (32%)
22
15
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnjstanton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.johnjstanton.com
388 ms
Horizontal-Logo.png
185 ms
banner.jpg
281 ms
john-stanton-cutout.png
191 ms
texture.png
199 ms
content-1-full.jpg
281 ms
js-logo.png
205 ms
attorney.png
219 ms
estate-plan.png
327 ms
probate.png
327 ms
b379eedb8ac361f0f9a7257d7fcdaf86677fefa79f9d928fe61fdb00b6d6c6be.js
533 ms
launch-4b8eab27482e.min.js
278 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
60 ms
family-law.png
336 ms
newoffice-comp.jpg
361 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
145 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
105 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
106 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
181 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
220 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
260 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
223 ms
modules.woff
340 ms
id
46 ms
EX3c3542d266c4483894170527bc8a6430-libraryCode_source.min.js
47 ms
AppMeasurement_Module_AudienceManagement.min.js
70 ms
js
74 ms
dialog-tech.js
141 ms
datadog-rum-v5.js
31 ms
34 ms
36 ms
s41177449645474
39 ms
css
170 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf
40 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf
53 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf
30 ms
e3t5euGtX-Co5MNzeAOqinEYo23CrdZM.ttf
66 ms
e3t5euGtX-Co5MNzeAOqinEYx2zCrdZM.ttf
48 ms
e3t5euGtX-Co5MNzeAOqinEY22_CrdZM.ttf
76 ms
e3t5euGtX-Co5MNzeAOqinEYj2rCrdZM.ttf
103 ms
e3tmeuGtX-Co5MNzeAOqinEQfEnS.ttf
89 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787wsuxJBkqg.ttf
80 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqg.ttf
89 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787zAvBJBkqg.ttf
94 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqg.ttf
106 ms
johnjstanton.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
johnjstanton.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
johnjstanton.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnjstanton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnjstanton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnjstanton.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Johnjstanton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: