4.6 sec in total
406 ms
3.9 sec
230 ms
Click here to check amazing Johnnn content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johnnn.tech
Visit johnnn.techWe analyzed Johnnn.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
johnnn.tech performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.341
33/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
406 ms
619 ms
594 ms
410 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Johnnn.tech, 2% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Johnnn.tech.
Page size can be reduced by 213.6 kB (22%)
950.0 kB
736.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Johnnn.tech main page is 950.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 765.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnnn images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.0 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnnn.tech has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (85%)
73
11
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnnn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johnnn.tech
406 ms
johnnn.tech
619 ms
style.min.css
594 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
410 ms
woocommerce.css
33 ms
codemirror.min.css
24 ms
blocks.style.build.min.css
26 ms
main.min.css
38 ms
font-awesome.min.css
48 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
53 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
53 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
55 ms
hooks.min.js
54 ms
w.js
17 ms
script.min.js
53 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
461 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
64 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
73 ms
js.cookie.min.js
73 ms
woocommerce.min.js
81 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
87 ms
js
69 ms
adsbygoogle.js
373 ms
wc-blocks.css
513 ms
style.css
16 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
16 ms
order-attribution.min.js
24 ms
react.min.js
24 ms
deprecated.min.js
32 ms
dom.min.js
34 ms
react-dom.min.js
46 ms
escape-html.min.js
47 ms
element.min.js
54 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
607 ms
i18n.min.js
63 ms
keycodes.min.js
71 ms
priority-queue.min.js
80 ms
compose.min.js
89 ms
private-apis.min.js
97 ms
redux-routine.min.js
105 ms
data.min.js
115 ms
lodash.min.js
128 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
138 ms
url.min.js
148 ms
api-fetch.min.js
158 ms
wc-settings.js
165 ms
data-controls.min.js
174 ms
html-entities.min.js
182 ms
notices.min.js
190 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
199 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
211 ms
dom-ready.min.js
221 ms
a11y.min.js
622 ms
primitives.min.js
230 ms
warning.min.js
238 ms
blocks-components.js
252 ms
blocks-checkout.js
261 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
269 ms
codemirror.min.js
1330 ms
autoLoadAssets.min.js
825 ms
init.min.js
481 ms
underscore.min.js
785 ms
scripts.min.js
545 ms
g.gif
165 ms
thumb-medium-empty.png
145 ms
show_ads_impl.js
275 ms
zrt_lookup.html
112 ms
titillium-light-webfont.svg
31 ms
titillium-regular-webfont.svg
596 ms
titillium-semibold-webfont.svg
44 ms
titillium-lightitalic-webfont.svg
606 ms
titillium-regularitalic-webfont.svg
621 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1512 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1024 ms
titillium-light-webfont.woff
1134 ms
titillium-semibold-webfont.woff
1136 ms
ads
28 ms
titillium-regular-webfont.woff
593 ms
titillium-lightitalic-webfont.woff
916 ms
titillium-regularitalic-webfont.woff
1154 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
534 ms
johnnn.tech accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
johnnn.tech best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
johnnn.tech SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnnn.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnnn.tech main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnnn.tech
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Johnnn. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: