1.5 sec in total
185 ms
832 ms
451 ms
Visit johnrothe.com now to see the best up-to-date John Rothe content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about johnrothe.com
Investment research blog from John Rothe, CMT. Topics focus on technical analysis, including momentum investment strategies, relative strength, and risk management tools.
Visit johnrothe.comWe analyzed Johnrothe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
johnrothe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value2.2 s
95/100
25%
Value5.4 s
55/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
185 ms
338 ms
21 ms
19 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Johnrothe.com, 23% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (338 ms) belongs to the original domain Johnrothe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 79.2 kB (12%)
664.1 kB
584.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Johnrothe.com main page is 664.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 549.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. John Rothe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 69 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnrothe.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)
14
7
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of John Rothe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johnrothe.com
185 ms
johnrothe.com
338 ms
style-index.css
21 ms
style.min.css
19 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-105-381.css
52 ms
et-core-unified-tb-105-381.min.css
39 ms
et-core-unified-381.min.css
58 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
30 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
34 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
37 ms
John-Rothe-1.png
46 ms
IBM-1970s-stagflation-1080x675.png
273 ms
css
34 ms
volatility-754x675.png
148 ms
ulcer-index-example-1080x675.png
186 ms
John-Rothe-CMT.jpg
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
67 ms
modules.woff
67 ms
johnrothe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
johnrothe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
johnrothe.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnrothe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnrothe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnrothe.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of John Rothe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: