Tools & Wizards About Us
johnsoncontrols.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

johnsoncontrols.com

Johnson Controls | Johnson Controls

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

738 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

619 ms

johnsoncontrols.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to johnsoncontrols.com homepage info - get ready to check Johnson Controls best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about johnsoncontrols.com

Applying data from both inside buildings and beyond, our customers can now manage operations systemically.

Visit johnsoncontrols.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Johnsoncontrols.com page load time and found that the first response time was 738 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

johnsoncontrols.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value58.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.7 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,440 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.13

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value55.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.johnsoncontrols.com

738 ms

dtagent624_exjnpr23_1057.js

163 ms

css

31 ms

bootstrap

314 ms

other

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Johnsoncontrols.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Statse.webtrendslive.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (738 ms) belongs to the original domain Johnsoncontrols.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 515.9 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Johnsoncontrols.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 60.4 kB

  • Original 70.1 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.7 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 186.3 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnson Controls images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 269.2 kB

  • Original 373.0 kB
  • After minification 320.7 kB
  • After compression 103.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 269.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 64 B

  • Original 244 B
  • After minification 222 B
  • After compression 180 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnsoncontrols.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64 B or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (55%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnson Controls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.johnsoncontrols.com

www.johnsoncontrols.com

738 ms

dtagent624_exjnpr23_1057.js

dtagent624_exjnpr23_1057.js

163 ms

css

css

31 ms

bootstrap

bootstrap

314 ms

other

other

176 ms

local

local

296 ms

jquery

jquery

262 ms

other

other

415 ms

localTop

localTop

250 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

webtrends.load.js

webtrends.load.js

221 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

131 ms

webtrends.js

webtrends.js

60 ms

SEGOEUI.TTF

SEGOEUI.TTF

257 ms

SegoeUI.woff

SegoeUI.woff

120 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

43 ms

jci-logo-black-and-white.png

jci-logo-black-and-white.png

175 ms

ent_banner_mobile_germany.jpg

ent_banner_mobile_germany.jpg

142 ms

jci-logo-color.png

jci-logo-color.png

141 ms

SegoeUILight.woff

SegoeUILight.woff

95 ms

jci.woff

jci.woff

116 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

116 ms

ent_product_skyscraper.jpg

ent_product_skyscraper.jpg

208 ms

ent_product_officewindows.jpg

ent_product_officewindows.jpg

295 ms

des_fullpage_batteries_darkened.jpg

des_fullpage_batteries_darkened.jpg

227 ms

batteryhome.jpg

batteryhome.jpg

175 ms

ae_mastlg_herombbclasscarfrontseat.jpg

ae_mastlg_herombbclasscarfrontseat.jpg

377 ms

globe_pixels.png

globe_pixels.png

222 ms

skylinebuildingsnewyorkskyscrapers.jpg

skylinebuildingsnewyorkskyscrapers.jpg

322 ms

WRc9.js

WRc9.js

22 ms

SegoeUISemibold.woff

SegoeUISemibold.woff

255 ms

webtrends.cg.js

webtrends.cg.js

237 ms

advancedLinkTracking.js

advancedLinkTracking.js

257 ms

webtrends.html5video.js

webtrends.html5video.js

277 ms

oss.js

oss.js

284 ms

wtid.js

wtid.js

57 ms

shorten

shorten

70 ms

dcs.gif

dcs.gif

3 ms

pd.js

pd.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

johnsoncontrols.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

johnsoncontrols.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

johnsoncontrols.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnsoncontrols.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Johnsoncontrols.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

johnsoncontrols.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Johnson Controls. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: