2.2 sec in total
132 ms
1.5 sec
557 ms
Welcome to johnsondesignandvideo.com homepage info - get ready to check Johnson Design Andvideo best content right away, or after learning these important things about johnsondesignandvideo.com
We're a team of creative professionals specializing in website design, video production, brand creation, and digital marketing strategy.
Visit johnsondesignandvideo.comWe analyzed Johnsondesignandvideo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
johnsondesignandvideo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value26.4 s
0/100
25%
Value19.8 s
0/100
10%
Value4,030 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.214
58/100
15%
Value35.8 s
0/100
10%
132 ms
217 ms
133 ms
139 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Johnsondesignandvideo.com, 76% (59 requests) were made to Getjrcreative.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (409 ms) relates to the external source Getjrcreative.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (28%)
4.9 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Johnsondesignandvideo.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 246.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 246.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Johnson Design Andvideo needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 64.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnsondesignandvideo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (82%)
68
12
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnson Design Andvideo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johnsondesignandvideo.com
132 ms
getjrcreative.com
217 ms
style.min.css
133 ms
styles.css
139 ms
uaf.css
55 ms
css
45 ms
bootstrap.min.css
168 ms
font-awesome.min.css
165 ms
slick.css
58 ms
magnific-popup.css
96 ms
style.css
97 ms
gutenberg-front.css
137 ms
js_composer.min.css
140 ms
175 ms
style.min.css
174 ms
slick.min.css
176 ms
icons.css
177 ms
animate.min.css
178 ms
jquery.min.js
202 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
214 ms
rbtools.min.js
232 ms
rs6.min.js
316 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
217 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
218 ms
slick.min.js
250 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
251 ms
slick-custom.min.js
252 ms
js
77 ms
js
133 ms
css
29 ms
animate.min.css
297 ms
rs6.css
297 ms
index.js
298 ms
index.js
299 ms
stickThis.js
300 ms
slick.min.js
300 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
364 ms
bootstrap.min.js
367 ms
wow.min.js
365 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
366 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
365 ms
api.js
51 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
409 ms
masonry.min.js
381 ms
countUp.js
378 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
339 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
332 ms
portfolio-web-custom.js
300 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
339 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
340 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
314 ms
index.js
301 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
302 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
303 ms
skrollr.min.js
399 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
382 ms
gtm.js
62 ms
dummy.png
293 ms
xfbml.customerchat.js
109 ms
js
137 ms
analytics.js
134 ms
Screen-Shot-2019-10-30-at-4.51.42-PM.png
242 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
113 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
128 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
220 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
222 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
223 ms
191122030513jrcregular.woff
129 ms
199 ms
collect
123 ms
collect
118 ms
Screen-Shot-2019-11-04-at-4.53.19-PM.png
315 ms
5revised-background.png
319 ms
1112222111212121212.png
150 ms
recaptcha__en.js
191 ms
JRC_Logo_Horizontal2.png
140 ms
ajax-loader.gif
104 ms
ult-silk.woff
59 ms
johnsondesignandvideo.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
johnsondesignandvideo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
johnsondesignandvideo.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnsondesignandvideo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnsondesignandvideo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnsondesignandvideo.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Johnson Design Andvideo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: