Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

johnsonmarineservices.com

HOME | Johnson Marine Services

Page Load Speed

430 ms in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

248 ms

Page Rendered

92 ms

johnsonmarineservices.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Johnson Marine Services content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johnsonmarineservices.com

Visit johnsonmarineservices.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Johnsonmarineservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 340 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

johnsonmarineservices.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

johnsonmarineservices.com

90 ms

johnsonmarineservices.com

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Johnsonmarineservices.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (127 ms) belongs to the original domain Johnsonmarineservices.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 92.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Johnsonmarineservices.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 323 B

  • Original 781 B
  • After minification 769 B
  • After compression 458 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 323 B or 41% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 91.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 964.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnson Marine Services images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 78.4 kB
  • After minification 78.4 kB
  • After compression 78.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 264 B

  • Original 19.0 kB
  • After minification 19.0 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnsonmarineservices.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

johnsonmarineservices.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

johnsonmarineservices.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

johnsonmarineservices.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnsonmarineservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Johnsonmarineservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Johnson Marine Services. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: