2.2 sec in total
481 ms
1.6 sec
133 ms
Click here to check amazing John Trail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johntrail.com
Visit johntrail.comWe analyzed Johntrail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 481 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
johntrail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.9 s
77/100
10%
481 ms
182 ms
179 ms
153 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Johntrail.com, 75% (21 requests) were made to Johntrail-rebrand.com and 18% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (706 ms) relates to the external source Johntrail-rebrand.com.
Page size can be reduced by 48.6 kB (6%)
868.9 kB
820.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Johntrail.com main page is 868.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 658.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. John Trail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johntrail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (86%)
21
3
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of John Trail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johntrail.com
481 ms
johntrail-rebrand.com
182 ms
bootstrap.min.css
179 ms
style.css
153 ms
utilities.css
156 ms
custom.css
148 ms
jquery.fullpage.min.css
148 ms
slick.min.css
157 ms
vegas.min.css
285 ms
all.min.css
299 ms
themify-icons.css
285 ms
css
39 ms
jquery.min.js
333 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
333 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
332 ms
jquery.form.min.js
416 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
406 ms
granim.min.js
426 ms
slick.min.js
438 ms
vegas.min.js
442 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js
458 ms
main.js
529 ms
john-edward-trail-marketing-manager-2020-brand-v2.jpg
706 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
18 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
22 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
26 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
29 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
30 ms
johntrail.com accessibility score
johntrail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
johntrail.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johntrail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johntrail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johntrail.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of John Trail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: