4.5 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.5 sec
937 ms
Visit jointer.in now to see the best up-to-date Jointer content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jointer.in
Visit jointer.inWe analyzed Jointer.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
jointer.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.09
92/100
15%
Value3.7 s
91/100
10%
1108 ms
68 ms
112 ms
338 ms
217 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Jointer.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jointer.in.
Page size can be reduced by 812.2 kB (52%)
1.6 MB
763.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Jointer.in main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 595.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.6 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jointer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 278.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 278.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 466.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jointer.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 466.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (19%)
63
51
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jointer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jointer.in
1108 ms
css
68 ms
font-awesome.min.css
112 ms
materialize.css
338 ms
style.css
217 ms
bootstrap.css
397 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.standalone.css
125 ms
jquery.timepicker.css
124 ms
responsive.css
423 ms
jquery.min.js
552 ms
bootstrap.js
548 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.js
527 ms
materialize.min.js
899 ms
jquery.timepicker.js
600 ms
custom.js
598 ms
logo.png
611 ms
20181213123613_15472.png
600 ms
20181212195413_76125.png
612 ms
20181212193836_64049.png
608 ms
20181212123454_30470.png
606 ms
20170929025941_23289.png
871 ms
20181212124137_62794.png
861 ms
20181212131331_71222.png
873 ms
20181212131848_49776.png
876 ms
20181212135735_30438.png
877 ms
20181213231647_92702.png
879 ms
20181212135307_20732.png
878 ms
20181212135402_89814.png
880 ms
20181212140918_83708.png
887 ms
20181212142843_50907.png
889 ms
20181213111121_95384.png
888 ms
20181212153712_92372.png
889 ms
20181212153838_40606.png
890 ms
20181212154239_77143.png
891 ms
20181212194647_99408.png
890 ms
20181212185633_43556.png
892 ms
20181212194455_61701.png
892 ms
20181212192527_88217.png
891 ms
20181212193210_27113.png
820 ms
back_arrow_circle.png
804 ms
20181212193401_81133.png
768 ms
20181212133955_64496.png
617 ms
20181212153449_37489.png
525 ms
20181212182224_27125.png
402 ms
20181212182639_57723.png
399 ms
20181213232224_99289.png
376 ms
20181130113839_29514.jpg
330 ms
20181213134034_48899.jpeg
364 ms
placeholder.jpg
360 ms
20170930174009_30775.jpg
349 ms
20171002144553_23264.jpg
352 ms
20170930151744_14729.gif
348 ms
20181219172933_95604.jpg
349 ms
20170930151329_32117.png
348 ms
20181127124359_78060.jpg
91 ms
20181124180855_17699.jpg
87 ms
mobile.png
315 ms
android.png
87 ms
apple.png
86 ms
preloader.jpg
84 ms
banner2.jpg
309 ms
strip-banner.jpg
135 ms
city.png
158 ms
arr.png
127 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
98 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
99 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
245 ms
jointer.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
jointer.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
jointer.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jointer.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Jointer.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jointer.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jointer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: