Tools & Wizards About Us
joliecartes.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

joliecartes.com

joliecartes.com - This website is for sale! - joliecartes Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

2.6 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

185 ms

joliecartes.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to joliecartes.com homepage info - get ready to check Joliecartes best content right away, or after learning these important things about joliecartes.com

This website is for sale! joliecartes.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, joliecartes.co...

Visit joliecartes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joliecartes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joliecartes.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.193

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joliecartes.com

2558 ms

px.js

64 ms

px.js

77 ms

caf.js

41 ms

newcafv2.js

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Joliecartes.com, 21% (3 requests) were made to D.rmgserving.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to A.rmgserving.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Joliecartes.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

139.0 kB

After Optimization

99.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Joliecartes.com main page is 139.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 63.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 48.0 kB
  • After minification 37.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joliecartes needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joliecartes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

joliecartes.com

joliecartes.com

2558 ms

px.js

px.js

64 ms

px.js

px.js

77 ms

caf.js

caf.js

41 ms

newcafv2.js

newcafv2.js

15 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

44 ms

frst_arr.jpg

frst_arr.jpg

41 ms

last_arr.jpg

last_arr.jpg

39 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

39 ms

slave.html

slave.html

11 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

180 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

8 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

10 ms

arrow-4.png

arrow-4.png

14 ms

Accessibility Review

joliecartes.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

joliecartes.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

joliecartes.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    >

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joliecartes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Joliecartes.com main page’s claimed encoding is >. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

joliecartes.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joliecartes. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: