Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

jollyjumper.com

Jolly Jumper - More than just a jumper

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

840 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

193 ms

jollyjumper.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jolly Jumper content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jollyjumper.com

Jolly Jumper® is known as a pioneer and global leader in the juvenile product industry.

Visit jollyjumper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jollyjumper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 840 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jollyjumper.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.476

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jollyjumper.com

840 ms

scaffold.css

886 ms

main.css

1890 ms

cms.css

1898 ms

jquery.js

2036 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Jollyjumper.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Hello.myfonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jollyjumper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 344.2 kB (42%)

Content Size

822.4 kB

After Optimization

478.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Jollyjumper.com main page is 822.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 373.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 16.4 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 358.9 kB
  • After minification 355.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jolly Jumper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 264.9 kB

  • Original 373.8 kB
  • After minification 305.0 kB
  • After compression 108.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 57.4 kB

  • Original 68.3 kB
  • After minification 50.7 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jollyjumper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (65%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jolly Jumper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jollyjumper.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

jollyjumper.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jollyjumper.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jollyjumper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jollyjumper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jolly Jumper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: