Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

jonastone.com

Naturstein & Feinsteinzeug | innen & außen | jonastone

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

276 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

543 ms

jonastone.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jonastone content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jonastone.com

Hochwertige Natursteine & Feinsteinzeug bequem vom Sofa aus betrachten & sofort bestellen! Erlesene & natürliche Steinböden von jonastone

Visit jonastone.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jonastone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jonastone.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,620 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jonastone.com

276 ms

www.jonastone.de

529 ms

head-0788fd8246a3c9da29ccf801ecfd14d9.merged.css

207 ms

head-b69feeebb52c7037aea730998e642ffa.merged.css

285 ms

head-f506a70fa7db25e64296dee380c93e96.merged.css

289 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jonastone.com, 64% (46 requests) were made to Jonastone.de and 14% (10 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Jonastone.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 466.1 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Jonastone.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 48.9 kB
  • After minification 47.7 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 57.1 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jonastone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 102.6 kB

  • Original 175.4 kB
  • After minification 174.7 kB
  • After compression 72.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.6 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 270.3 kB

  • Original 329.6 kB
  • After minification 324.6 kB
  • After compression 59.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jonastone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 270.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (30%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jonastone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jonastone.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jonastone.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

jonastone.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jonastone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jonastone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jonastone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: