Tools & Wizards About Us
jonathangood.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

jonathangood.com

お中元 残暑見舞い 夏 ギフト 当店限定P10倍 - スマホ、タブレット、パソコン | jonathangood.com

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

jonathangood.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jonathangood content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jonathangood.com

お中元 残暑見舞い 夏 ギフト 当店限定P10倍 スマホ、タブレット、パソコン | jonathangood.com

Visit jonathangood.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jonathangood.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jonathangood.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jonathangood.com

205 ms

jonathangood

6 ms

jonathangood

40 ms

bootstrap.bundle.en.js

148 ms

176651799.js

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jonathangood.com, 31% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.about.me and 14% (4 requests) were made to Api.mixpanel.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (509 ms) relates to the external source Api.segment.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.0 kB (51%)

Content Size

706.7 kB

After Optimization

347.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jonathangood.com main page is 706.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 422.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 87.9 kB

  • Original 128.8 kB
  • After minification 126.6 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 155.7 kB
  • After minification 145.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jonathangood images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 261.2 kB

  • Original 422.3 kB
  • After minification 421.2 kB
  • After compression 161.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.2 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jonathangood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jonathangood.com

jonathangood.com

205 ms

jonathangood

jonathangood

6 ms

jonathangood

jonathangood

40 ms

bootstrap.bundle.en.js

bootstrap.bundle.en.js

148 ms

176651799.js

176651799.js

30 ms

index.bundle.en.js

index.bundle.en.js

196 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

114 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

4.profile.bundle.en.js

4.profile.bundle.en.js

81 ms

ProximaNova-Reg-webfont.woff

ProximaNova-Reg-webfont.woff

44 ms

ProximaNova-Light-webfont.woff

ProximaNova-Light-webfont.woff

85 ms

proximanovacond-sbold-webfont.woff

proximanovacond-sbold-webfont.woff

152 ms

ProximaNova-Bold-webfont.woff

ProximaNova-Bold-webfont.woff

151 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

53 ms

01ee118052a9f5cc58b7534ca204e1b29e390145.js

01ee118052a9f5cc58b7534ca204e1b29e390145.js

111 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

0.admin_flag.bundle.en.js

0.admin_flag.bundle.en.js

66 ms

view_page

view_page

142 ms

p

p

496 ms

t

t

502 ms

t

t

509 ms

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

133 ms

m.js

m.js

122 ms

jonathangood_1384887744_74.jpg

jonathangood_1384887744_74.jpg

505 ms

aboutme-glyphs.woff

aboutme-glyphs.woff

60 ms

30 ms

30 ms

29 ms

13 ms

Accessibility Review

jonathangood.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jonathangood.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jonathangood.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jonathangood.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jonathangood.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jonathangood.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jonathangood. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: