Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

joncraton.org

Jon Craton

Page Load Speed

658 ms in total

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

386 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

joncraton.org screenshot

About Website

Visit joncraton.org now to see the best up-to-date Jon Craton content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joncraton.org

Visit joncraton.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Joncraton.org page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 560 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joncraton.org performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joncraton.org

98 ms

joncraton.org

186 ms

analytics.js

34 ms

family.jpg

103 ms

collect

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Joncraton.org, 40% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (186 ms) belongs to the original domain Joncraton.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 kB (2%)

Content Size

97.5 kB

After Optimization

95.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Joncraton.org main page is 97.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 74.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 51% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 74.3 kB
  • After minification 74.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jon Craton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 59 B

  • Original 19.8 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jon Craton. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

joncraton.org accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

joncraton.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

joncraton.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joncraton.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Joncraton.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jon Craton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: