Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

jonesandstokes.com

ICF: Strategic Consulting & Communications for a Digital World | ICF

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

531 ms

jonesandstokes.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jonesandstokes.com homepage info - get ready to check Jonesandstokes best content right away, or after learning these important things about jonesandstokes.com

We make big things possible for our clients. We provide data, insights, and deep implementation expertise they need to deliver results that matter.

Visit jonesandstokes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jonesandstokes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jonesandstokes.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,060 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jonesandstokes.com

148 ms

www.icf.com

545 ms

gtm.js

71 ms

main.min.css

535 ms

VisitorIdentification.js

297 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jonesandstokes.com, 78% (32 requests) were made to Icf.com and 12% (5 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) relates to the external source Icf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 298.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Jonesandstokes.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 156.4 kB

  • Original 175.8 kB
  • After minification 115.4 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 60.4 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jonesandstokes images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 392.7 kB
  • After minification 392.7 kB
  • After compression 390.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 134.4 kB

  • Original 368.3 kB
  • After minification 368.3 kB
  • After compression 233.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jonesandstokes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.4 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (25%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jonesandstokes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jonesandstokes.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jonesandstokes.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jonesandstokes.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jonesandstokes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jonesandstokes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jonesandstokes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: