2.4 sec in total
123 ms
922 ms
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Jon Satrom content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jonsatrom.com
Visit jonsatrom.comWe analyzed Jonsatrom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
jonsatrom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
76/100
10%
123 ms
6 ms
8 ms
8 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Jonsatrom.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (458 ms) belongs to the original domain Jonsatrom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 135.4 kB (6%)
2.2 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Jonsatrom.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jon Satrom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jonsatrom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (8%)
93
86
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jon Satrom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jonsatrom.com
123 ms
normalize.css
6 ms
nav.css
8 ms
style.css
8 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
38 ms
jQuery.wideText.js
9 ms
jquery.min.js
74 ms
header_animate.js
5 ms
bgram.png
86 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
0.png
13 ms
Fig1JonSatrom.jpg
85 ms
dino200.gif
49 ms
hand-gesture-to-mean-talking-too-much-smiley-emoticon.gif
26 ms
pattern.jpg
28 ms
machinevision_0.jpg
44 ms
artworks-000148249593-dbkbdl-t500x500.jpg
43 ms
mustachescreen.png
91 ms
1592292a_orig.jpg
136 ms
box.gif
58 ms
box.gif
144 ms
box.gif
105 ms
box.gif
128 ms
box.gif
133 ms
box.gif
221 ms
box.gif
133 ms
box.gif
181 ms
box.gif
214 ms
box.gif
192 ms
box.gif
192 ms
box.gif
231 ms
box.gif
213 ms
box.gif
269 ms
box.gif
271 ms
box.gif
284 ms
box.gif
292 ms
box.gif
299 ms
box.gif
275 ms
box.gif
333 ms
box.gif
383 ms
box.gif
314 ms
box.gif
357 ms
preview.jpg
332 ms
box.gif
364 ms
box.gif
439 ms
box.gif
370 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
51 ms
box.gif
409 ms
box.gif
365 ms
box.gif
426 ms
box.gif
420 ms
box.gif
391 ms
box.gif
398 ms
box.gif
458 ms
box.gif
437 ms
box.gif
404 ms
box.gif
425 ms
globe_rotate.gif
379 ms
1.png
11 ms
2.png
19 ms
3.png
20 ms
4.png
21 ms
5.png
21 ms
6.png
26 ms
7.png
38 ms
8.png
37 ms
9.png
38 ms
10.png
40 ms
11.png
42 ms
12.png
49 ms
13.png
52 ms
14.png
49 ms
15.png
51 ms
16.png
54 ms
17.png
59 ms
18.png
59 ms
19.png
58 ms
20.png
58 ms
21.png
59 ms
22.png
60 ms
23.png
60 ms
24.png
67 ms
25.png
63 ms
26.png
65 ms
27.png
68 ms
28.png
70 ms
29.png
72 ms
30.png
77 ms
31.png
80 ms
32.png
82 ms
33.png
83 ms
34.png
86 ms
jonsatrom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jonsatrom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
jonsatrom.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jonsatrom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jonsatrom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jonsatrom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jon Satrom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: