31.9 sec in total
15 sec
16.4 sec
552 ms
Visit joomla.cat now to see the best up-to-date Joomla content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joomla.cat
Visit joomla.catWe analyzed Joomla.cat page load time and found that the first response time was 15 sec and then it took 16.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
joomla.cat performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
15031 ms
571 ms
353 ms
368 ms
388 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Joomla.cat, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15 sec) belongs to the original domain Joomla.cat.
Page size can be reduced by 264.5 kB (58%)
457.8 kB
193.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Joomla.cat main page is 457.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 211.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joomla needs image optimization as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 168.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joomla.cat needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 168.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (70%)
40
12
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joomla. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
joomla.cat
15031 ms
style.css
571 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
353 ms
reset.min.css
368 ms
newtheme1.css
388 ms
styles.css
372 ms
style.css
606 ms
screen.min.css
609 ms
frontend-render.css
919 ms
flare.css
843 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
1183 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
850 ms
inboundAnalytics.min.js
1083 ms
cta-variation.js
1095 ms
superfish.js
1101 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
1242 ms
css
14 ms
default.css
1325 ms
shortcodes.css
1397 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
950 ms
custom.css
254 ms
pensamiento.jpg
424 ms
ejercicios-para-reducir-la-cintura1-300x200.jpg
270 ms
strips.png
246 ms
o-DIET-facebook-300x150.jpg
254 ms
ico-search.png
244 ms
woothemes.png
594 ms
style.css
242 ms
jquery.ck.min.js
261 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
393 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
263 ms
ninjapopups.min.js
310 ms
jquery.form.min.js
643 ms
scripts.js
495 ms
front.min.js
512 ms
modernizr.js
612 ms
fancybox_overlay.png
243 ms
bg.jpg
602 ms
close.png
262 ms
fancybox_sprite.png
234 ms
joomla.cat accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
joomla.cat best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
joomla.cat SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joomla.cat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Joomla.cat main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joomla.cat
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joomla. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: