Tools & Wizards About Us
joomspear.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

joomspear.com

Web designer's Collections- JoomSpear- Wordpress & Joomla

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.6 sec

Page Rendered

180 ms

joomspear.com screenshot

About Website

Visit joomspear.com now to see the best up-to-date Joom Spear content for Bangladesh and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joomspear.com

Visit joomspear.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joomspear.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joomspear.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.487

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.joomspear.com

2263 ms

a0z2z.js

267 ms

js

63 ms

a0z2z.css

531 ms

js

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Joomspear.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 11% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Joomspear.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.5 kB (15%)

Content Size

966.4 kB

After Optimization

816.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Joomspear.com main page is 966.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 638.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 148.8 kB

  • Original 179.1 kB
  • After minification 176.2 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 106 B

  • Original 638.3 kB
  • After minification 638.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joom Spear images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 615 B

  • Original 132.3 kB
  • After minification 132.3 kB
  • After compression 131.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 27 B

  • Original 16.7 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joomspear.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (39%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joom Spear. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.joomspear.com

www.joomspear.com

2263 ms

a0z2z.js

a0z2z.js

267 ms

js

js

63 ms

a0z2z.css

a0z2z.css

531 ms

js

js

109 ms

page-preloader.js

page-preloader.js

788 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

1322 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

793 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

842 ms

common.js

common.js

843 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

44 ms

logo.png

logo.png

563 ms

webdesign.png

webdesign.png

1296 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

3 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

html5.jpg

html5.jpg

1151 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

1214 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

K2FyfZJVlfNNSEBXGY7UAok.woff

K2FyfZJVlfNNSEBXGY7UAok.woff

58 ms

K2FyfZJVlfNNSEBXGY7UAoo.ttf

K2FyfZJVlfNNSEBXGY7UAoo.ttf

68 ms

pencil-in-Different-Color.jpg

pencil-in-Different-Color.jpg

272 ms

wp-customiser.jpg

wp-customiser.jpg

1097 ms

SEO.jpg

SEO.jpg

817 ms

CMS-migration.jpg

CMS-migration.jpg

681 ms

Template-bugs.jpg

Template-bugs.jpg

697 ms

Virtual-Work.jpg

Virtual-Work.jpg

763 ms

a0z2z.css

a0z2z.css

266 ms

Accessibility Review

joomspear.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

joomspear.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

joomspear.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joomspear.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joomspear.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

joomspear.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joom Spear. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: