4.4 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.9 sec
190 ms
Visit joomsport.com now to see the best up-to-date Joom Sport content for Egypt and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joomsport.com
WordPress sports plugin and themes ✔ Joomla sports component and templates ✔ Sports Team Management App
Visit joomsport.comWe analyzed Joomsport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
joomsport.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.495
16/100
15%
Value12.7 s
14/100
10%
1305 ms
88 ms
156 ms
153 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Joomsport.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Static-v.tawk.to and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Joomsport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (51%)
4.7 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Joomsport.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joom Sport images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 855.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joomsport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 855.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (61%)
74
29
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joom Sport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
joomsport.com
1305 ms
bootstrap.css
88 ms
style.css
156 ms
system.css
153 ms
template.css
164 ms
megamenu.css
152 ms
font-awesome.min.css
173 ms
stylesheet.css
174 ms
extensions.css
228 ms
custom.css
231 ms
jbsponsors.css
226 ms
frontend_default.css
242 ms
jquery.min.js
247 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
237 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
301 ms
bootstrap.js
311 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
311 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
325 ms
mootools-core.js
328 ms
core.js
321 ms
mootools-more.js
461 ms
caption.js
385 ms
jquery.tap.min.js
385 ms
script.js
395 ms
menu.js
404 ms
script.js
401 ms
nav-collapse.js
468 ms
jquery.jcarousellite.min.js
461 ms
hikashop.js
475 ms
lightbox.css
475 ms
n2-ss-2.css
482 ms
n2-ss-3.css
535 ms
n2.js
545 ms
nextend-gsap.min.js
552 ms
nextend-frontend.min.js
558 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
561 ms
smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js
558 ms
smartslider-block-type-frontend.min.js
526 ms
system.css
478 ms
nextend-webfontloader.min.js
587 ms
n2-ss-2.js
587 ms
lightbox.js
570 ms
default
61 ms
close.png
121 ms
css
37 ms
loading.gif
124 ms
prev.png
124 ms
next.png
123 ms
bear-21.jpg
425 ms
JoomSport-logo.png
211 ms
swp1.png
174 ms
ff8x8_n.png
219 ms
wchl-n.png
219 ms
villar.png
219 ms
lm.png
218 ms
sw-new.png
332 ms
coch.png
334 ms
Vienna-Constables.png
334 ms
fbook.png
335 ms
lnln.png
335 ms
tw.png
334 ms
slider_mobile_new1.png
798 ms
icons.png
204 ms
emojione.min.css
236 ms
emojione.min.js
236 ms
1504666527272
468 ms
analytics.js
318 ms
hqdefault.jpg
330 ms
ajax-loader.gif
219 ms
bg-submenu.png
378 ms
backjs.jpg
393 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
185 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
447 ms
h3border.png
356 ms
bg.png
344 ms
rabiohead-webfont.woff
350 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
50 ms
ga-audiences
98 ms
ajax-loader-3.gif
36 ms
231 ms
joomsport.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
joomsport.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
joomsport.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joomsport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joomsport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joomsport.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joom Sport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: