2.2 sec in total
326 ms
1.5 sec
293 ms
Visit joopbox.com now to see the best up-to-date JOOPbox content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joopbox.com
En JOOPbox nos hemos especializado en garantizarle las mejores y más asombrosas soluciones para que tu negocio y proyecto esté en la nube.
Visit joopbox.comWe analyzed Joopbox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 326 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
joopbox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value2,530 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.137
79/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
326 ms
25 ms
171 ms
166 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Joopbox.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) belongs to the original domain Joopbox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 222.6 kB (40%)
553.6 kB
331.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Joopbox.com main page is 553.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 270.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JOOPbox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joopbox.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (61%)
31
12
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JOOPbox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.joopbox.com
326 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
171 ms
styles.css
166 ms
superfish.css
198 ms
flexslider.css
198 ms
jquery.js
300 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
198 ms
comment-reply.min.js
243 ms
jquery.form.min.js
253 ms
scripts.js
255 ms
superfish.js
257 ms
jquery.debouncedresize.js
263 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
352 ms
jquery.actual.min.js
352 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
351 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
352 ms
tinynav.min.js
352 ms
theme_trust.js
379 ms
df.js
403 ms
wp-embed.min.js
419 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
253 ms
logo_joopbox2.png
128 ms
gui.png
127 ms
slide_bg_green1.jpg
189 ms
slide_cloudserver.png
412 ms
home_product_phpbooster1.png
276 ms
home_product_box-m1.png
281 ms
home_product_joopsend1.png
281 ms
home_support_bg1.jpg
413 ms
clients_logos1.gif
235 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
28 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
46 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
51 ms
bg_noise1.png
171 ms
joopbox.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
joopbox.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
joopbox.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joopbox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joopbox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
joopbox.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JOOPbox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: