1.3 sec in total
103 ms
813 ms
358 ms
Welcome to jotter.com homepage info - get ready to check Jotter best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about jotter.com
From seed to growth capital, Jotter Ventures invests in a broad range of technology companies across all stages.
Visit jotter.comWe analyzed Jotter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
jotter.com performance score
103 ms
269 ms
47 ms
30 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jotter.com, 56% (28 requests) were made to D9hhrg4mnvzow.cloudfront.net and 14% (7 requests) were made to Builder-assets.unbounce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (332 ms) relates to the external source D9hhrg4mnvzow.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 249.8 kB (14%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Jotter.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 180.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180.9 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jotter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 726 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jotter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 726 B or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (53%)
45
21
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jotter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jotter.com
103 ms
www.jotter.com
269 ms
page-defaults-7b5360a.z.css
47 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
unbounce.js
37 ms
main-90cd9cc.z.js
61 ms
matchMedia-ba7af92.z.js
60 ms
main-784af76.z.js
61 ms
main-8ff2ac3.z.js
62 ms
main-45fdb51.z.js
44 ms
webfont.js
38 ms
ub-browser-a7155e5.z.js
68 ms
conversion.js
20 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
fbevents.js
89 ms
mtracking.gif
133 ms
093bf757-jotter-logo-copy-3_05j01r04x01r00b000.png
67 ms
46 ms
9bc7cf92-apple-small_00o00n00o00n000000.png
100 ms
32b837ca-android-small_00o00p00o00o000000.png
141 ms
491e8e3d-laptop-small_00o00p00o00o000000.png
63 ms
transparent.gif
46 ms
c23c21d3-jotterapp_016015016015000000.png
96 ms
1a3957a4-map-pointer2.png
44 ms
a765ecde-camera3.png
93 ms
4bd6c207-photography111.png
201 ms
89f0ac7e-documents7.png
91 ms
e51930d9-magnifying47.png
124 ms
bcdb2222-users6.png
141 ms
31d3f2c8-users81.png
200 ms
2d443007-one62.png
135 ms
093bf757-jotter-logo-copy-3_02w00x02w00x000000.png
230 ms
7da0cab0-crew.png
208 ms
b9df3dfb-5-elements-header-image.png
222 ms
a8230a00-store.jpg
206 ms
a52d0fe7-electricians.JPG
256 ms
10e6908d-plumbers.jpg
274 ms
c1d53492-flooring.jpg
251 ms
218c3a1e-carpenter.jpg
332 ms
a7bc0bb0-hvac.jpg
275 ms
406a0069-landscapers.jpg
276 ms
66afc5ea-painter.jpg
271 ms
6a54d3fe-ios-crew-chat_08f0er08f0dj000000.png
287 ms
f97f6eab-shadow-image-106533_07y09h07x09h000000.png
316 ms
f9511ead-platforms-mailer_0cn09h0c109h00m000.png
324 ms
collect
23 ms
31 ms
collect
62 ms
104 ms
ga-audiences
16 ms
jotter.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jotter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jotter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jotter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jotter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: