Tools & Wizards About Us
journaljamps.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

journaljamps.com

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

855 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

75 ms

journaljamps.com screenshot

About Website

Visit journaljamps.com now to see the best up-to-date Journaljamps content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about journaljamps.com

Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences aims to publish high quality papers (Click here for Types of paper) in all areas of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. The journal also enc...

Visit journaljamps.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Journaljamps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 855 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

journaljamps.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.145

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

JAMPS

855 ms

polyfill.min.js

548 ms

tex-mml-chtml.js

33 ms

element.js

56 ms

css2

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Journaljamps.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (855 ms) belongs to the original domain Journaljamps.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

155.6 kB

After Optimization

131.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Journaljamps.com main page is 155.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 77.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 25.9 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 71 B

  • Original 77.0 kB
  • After minification 77.0 kB
  • After compression 77.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 601 B

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journaljamps.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (80%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

3

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journaljamps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

JAMPS

JAMPS

855 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

548 ms

tex-mml-chtml.js

tex-mml-chtml.js

33 ms

element.js

element.js

56 ms

css2

css2

36 ms

fa_all.min.css

fa_all.min.css

396 ms

v4-font-face.css

v4-font-face.css

709 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

785 ms

custom.css

custom.css

711 ms

styleSheet.css

styleSheet.css

710 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

820 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

830 ms

custom.js

custom.js

756 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

114 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d.ttf

126 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyB9BN9d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyB9BN9d.ttf

136 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAjBN9d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAjBN9d.ttf

171 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyDPA99d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyDPA99d.ttf

177 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d.ttf

171 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyCjA99d.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyCjA99d.ttf

176 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

208 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

223 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

804 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

604 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

js

js

86 ms

Accessibility Review

journaljamps.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

journaljamps.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

journaljamps.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journaljamps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Journaljamps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

journaljamps.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Journaljamps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: