2.3 sec in total
62 ms
1.6 sec
600 ms
Click here to check amazing Journal Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about journalreview.com
The Journal Review provides news coverage from Crawfordsville, Indiana, and the surrounding Montgomery County area.
Visit journalreview.comWe analyzed Journalreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Journalreview.com rating and web reputation
journalreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value47.0 s
0/100
10%
Value13,740 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.134
80/100
15%
Value83.1 s
0/100
10%
62 ms
103 ms
38 ms
40 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 162 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Journalreview.com, 68% (110 requests) were made to Bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (345 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (55%)
3.1 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Journalreview.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 225.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 225.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Journal Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 867.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 867.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 601.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journalreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 601.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 88 (57%)
155
67
The browser has sent 155 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journal Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
journalreview.com
62 ms
www.journalreview.com
103 ms
jquery-ui-default.min.css
38 ms
ads.min.css
40 ms
dropdown.css
42 ms
dropdown.vertical.css
47 ms
default.css
50 ms
styles.min.css
69 ms
_switcher.css
55 ms
site.css
58 ms
sliders.min.css
63 ms
player.css
96 ms
yepnope.min.js
99 ms
jquery.min.js
100 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
104 ms
user.js
118 ms
ads_expandable.js
100 ms
ads_page_curl.js
101 ms
ads_text.js
127 ms
jquery.cookie.js
126 ms
tracking.js
39 ms
tncms-ad-limits.js
101 ms
ads.js
40 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
103 ms
jsapi
34 ms
poll.js
103 ms
flowplayer-3.2.13.min.js
105 ms
background1.js
103 ms
tracker.js
97 ms
leaderboard-top1.js
104 ms
tile-top1.js
105 ms
leaderboard-middle1.js
106 ms
pencil1.js
106 ms
center-top1.js
110 ms
sports1.js
37 ms
rail-top1.js
103 ms
rail-top2.js
104 ms
rail-top3.js
107 ms
rail-middle1.js
255 ms
rail-middle2.js
112 ms
rail-middle3.js
113 ms
rail-middle4.js
114 ms
150.js
257 ms
static.js
78 ms
rail-bottom1.js
238 ms
rail-bottom2.js
101 ms
rail-bottom3.js
99 ms
dropdown.css
96 ms
leaderboard-bottom1.js
218 ms
external.common.min.js
214 ms
global.extensions.js
209 ms
global.extensions.jquery.js
201 ms
blox.scripts.js
174 ms
yepnope.scripts.js
174 ms
56 ms
55e8a7801dcf8.image.jpg
55 ms
55e87a3106548.image.jpg
57 ms
55e87a0974fb4.image.jpg
57 ms
Yorkbackground.png
120 ms
print-logo.gif
39 ms
blank.gif
27 ms
56d0a66a6c06e.image.gif
29 ms
55ba4ec18edbc.image.gif
139 ms
logo.png
28 ms
21.png
61 ms
right_arrow_white.png
69 ms
564351475ead3.image.gif
38 ms
ajax-loader.gif
37 ms
place_holder.png
38 ms
56d3b52082e1e.image.jpg
40 ms
56d12c0722f56.image.jpg
52 ms
56d0dfa8b71c4.image.jpg
39 ms
56cfc6c59258a.image.jpg
54 ms
56cfc74117ae5.image.jpg
54 ms
56cfc519368c6.image.jpg
55 ms
56ce31b28f3df.image.jpg
56 ms
56cd25166bc46.image.jpg
56 ms
56ccf832d64ca.image.jpg
63 ms
56cbfd4cd3bee.image.jpg
63 ms
56ca8b8aae5ac.image.jpg
66 ms
56cde606b3e99.image.jpg
115 ms
56c7accaed578.image.jpg
67 ms
56c621e968f00.image.jpg
66 ms
56c52166e9d49.image.jpg
119 ms
56c397d7ca7d3.image.jpg
79 ms
56bb9333ad51d.image.jpg
80 ms
56ba37e71dc09.image.jpg
75 ms
56b3c692c70a0.image.jpg
75 ms
56b26764ba115.image.jpg
73 ms
56b123a71cc29.image.jpg
73 ms
56cfded743532.image.jpg
73 ms
56c791752420c.image.jpg
94 ms
56c52263b3458.image.jpg
93 ms
56c1290975d47.image.jpg
94 ms
55cd4d403d8d3.preview.jpg
94 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
70 ms
jquery.jcarousel.js
56 ms
featured-background.gif
58 ms
point-icon.gif
59 ms
ui-icons_222222_256x240.png
82 ms
56b9f60797f81.image.gif
41 ms
rss-icon.gif
42 ms
related-sprite.png
43 ms
print.css
25 ms
jquery.jcarousel.js
10 ms
13 ms
ui+en.css
4 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,corechart+en.I.js
25 ms
top-heading-bg2.png
11 ms
5643611975c92.image.gif
26 ms
527941a9cb51d.image.gif
18 ms
bg-heading-cal.gif
130 ms
551c0667b6a07.image.gif
12 ms
5653453d897c8.image.gif
128 ms
53c67f4256182.image.gif
126 ms
5698f0b03e91c.image.gif
13 ms
NYA_tab_a.gif
26 ms
NYA_tab_b.gif
24 ms
COMP_tab_a.gif
34 ms
COMP_tab_b.gif
24 ms
SPX_tab_a.gif
114 ms
SPX_tab_b.gif
115 ms
spacer.gif
115 ms
NYA.gif
116 ms
down.gif
116 ms
516c6bdbca50e.image.gif
13 ms
54594ed30ab1a.image.gif
13 ms
56bcceb573a0e.image.gif
13 ms
bottom-block-separator.gif
20 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
ff2.css
70 ms
-CRYZW_mrlM
190 ms
85 ms
addthis_widget.js
39 ms
all.js
179 ms
jquery.floatingfixed.js
40 ms
user_70.png
39 ms
featured-left-arrow.gif
37 ms
top-heading-bg.png
35 ms
featured-right-arrow.gif
78 ms
collect
26 ms
jquery.floatingfixed.js
25 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png
9 ms
ui-bg_glass_55_fbf9ee_1x400.png
10 ms
ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png
10 ms
addthis_widget.js
15 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
85 ms
www-embed-player.js
137 ms
base.js
220 ms
all.js
93 ms
237 ms
xd_arbiter.php
192 ms
xd_arbiter.php
345 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
45 ms
ad_status.js
128 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
117 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
142 ms
55a0085bc6bd5.smallImage.jpg
55 ms
300lo.json
37 ms
56929ed9ecb2a.largeImage.gif
33 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
30 ms
xd_arbiter.php
83 ms
journalreview.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
journalreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
journalreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journalreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Journalreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
journalreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Journal Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: