3.2 sec in total
16 ms
1.4 sec
1.8 sec
Visit journey.travel now to see the best up-to-date Journey content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about journey.travel
Hotel performance marketing, eCommerce and technology. Driving digital performance for luxury hotels and resorts around the world.
Visit journey.travelWe analyzed Journey.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
journey.travel performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
16 ms
72 ms
116 ms
34 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Journey.travel, 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (807 ms) relates to the external source Static-ssl.responsetap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 179.4 kB (40%)
443.2 kB
263.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Journey.travel main page is 443.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 241.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Journey needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 94.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.9 kB or 39% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journey.travel has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (90%)
69
7
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journey. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
journey.travel
16 ms
journey.travel
72 ms
gtm.js
116 ms
announcement.css
34 ms
style.min.css
73 ms
main.css
77 ms
front-legacy.css
80 ms
style.css
80 ms
style.css
46 ms
eei7djd.css
203 ms
swiper-bundle.css
62 ms
flickity-fade.css
71 ms
jquery.min.js
75 ms
modernizr.js
74 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
74 ms
plyr.css
96 ms
child-app.js
99 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
95 ms
swiper-bundle.js
95 ms
remodal.js
94 ms
flickity.pkgd.js
95 ms
hash.js
134 ms
flickity-fade.js
134 ms
imgix.js
135 ms
ajax-modal.js
133 ms
class-toggle.js
132 ms
share-intent.js
132 ms
slideout-toggle.js
137 ms
equal-height-widgets.js
138 ms
on-scroll.js
136 ms
scrollto.js
136 ms
select-redirect.js
136 ms
app.js
177 ms
defer.js
136 ms
element-cycle.js
177 ms
hero.js
185 ms
anchor-menu.js
177 ms
anchor-menu.js
184 ms
photoswipe.js
177 ms
5acd6672764ddf1ce162d893e08d4504.js
783 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.js
176 ms
image-gallery.js
170 ms
gallery-trigger.js
132 ms
isotope.pkgd.js
123 ms
grid-filter.js
125 ms
cta-grid-filter.js
131 ms
plyr.polyfilled.js
132 ms
media.js
125 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
131 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
129 ms
dom-ready.min.js
122 ms
hooks.min.js
128 ms
i18n.min.js
101 ms
a11y.min.js
105 ms
jquery.json.min.js
105 ms
gravityforms.min.js
107 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
105 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
hotjar-1492637.js
293 ms
p.css
111 ms
collect
75 ms
collect
185 ms
ga-audiences
409 ms
fbevents.js
448 ms
rTapTrack.min.js
807 ms
163187.js
474 ms
hotjar-3337.js
324 ms
d
318 ms
d
393 ms
modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js
466 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
132 ms
713937571974010
92 ms
placeholder.png
192 ms
journey.travel accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
journey.travel best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
journey.travel SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journey.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Journey.travel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
journey.travel
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Journey. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: