7.2 sec in total
2.3 sec
4.4 sec
424 ms
Welcome to journeyline.in homepage info - get ready to check Journey Line best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about journeyline.in
Visit journeyline.inWe analyzed Journeyline.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
journeyline.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value18.4 s
0/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.143
78/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
2346 ms
179 ms
132 ms
12 ms
591 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Journeyline.in, 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (6 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Journeyline.in.
Page size can be reduced by 494.3 kB (49%)
1.0 MB
514.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Journeyline.in main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 559.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Journey Line images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 365.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 365.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journeyline.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)
66
30
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journey Line. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
journeyline.in
2346 ms
calendarDateInput.js
179 ms
jl.css
132 ms
addthis_widget.js
12 ms
get_code.aspx
591 ms
frontnewsticker.aspx
382 ms
pkgallery.aspx
1558 ms
maindisp.aspx
598 ms
bse.png
475 ms
left-shadow.jpg
54 ms
upper-gd.jpg
79 ms
journey-line3_08.jpg
181 ms
menu-bg.jpg
78 ms
leadpage.jpg
99 ms
read_more_button.gif
243 ms
mustard.jpg
116 ms
bullet1.jpg
138 ms
bullet2.jpg
154 ms
bullet3.jpg
176 ms
nse.png
473 ms
calendar.jpg
202 ms
prev.gif
186 ms
next.gif
186 ms
likebox.php
182 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
342 ms
jGc-59L_9lo.css
388 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
522 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
655 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
548 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
546 ms
style.css
51 ms
ticker-style.css
63 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
jquery.ticker.js
158 ms
site.js
144 ms
300lo.json
69 ms
right-shadow.jpg
47 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
61 ms
ga.js
74 ms
breaking-bg.jpg
56 ms
controls.png
345 ms
bse.png
1102 ms
nse.png
1117 ms
90852012320165767.jpg
316 ms
11081225_818533131516369_6826564776159660701_n.jpg
348 ms
10300080_771560659546950_2026443190505541364_n.jpg
414 ms
17096_817545618326496_134244203179181501_n.jpg
482 ms
10500299_767014550097730_7167349811137033154_n.jpg
550 ms
12814541_750479931754739_2126412974232014966_n.jpg
549 ms
12373304_982487301817372_4263515594661730010_n.jpg
551 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
71 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
72 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
68 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
73 ms
style.css
120 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
124 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
101 ms
jquery.galleryview-1.1.js
119 ms
jquery.timers-1.1.2.js
102 ms
20323-13-2016-23-43-26-962.jpg
366 ms
pointer.png
98 ms
next.png
100 ms
prev.png
100 ms
20253-6-2016-23-59-42-907.jpg
315 ms
20462-28-2016-0-52-48-620.jpg
281 ms
20272-9-2016-0-25-41-186.jpg
319 ms
20341-17-2016-1-3-42-94.jpg
286 ms
20271-10-2016-23-28-44-500.jpg
259 ms
20271-10-2016-23-28-10-141.jpg
320 ms
20271-10-2016-23-27-30-94.jpg
342 ms
journeyline.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
journeyline.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
journeyline.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journeyline.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Journeyline.in main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
journeyline.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Journey Line. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: