Tools & Wizards About Us
joverfelt.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

joverfelt.net

Jason Overfelt – Assistant Professor; Department of Linguistics, Oakland University

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

551 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

joverfelt.net screenshot

About Website

Visit joverfelt.net now to see the best up-to-date J Overfelt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joverfelt.net

Publications To appear. The syntax of sluicing-like constructions in English. In the Proceedings of the 53rd Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, eds. Suet-Ying Lam and Satoru Ozaki.  Amhers...

Visit joverfelt.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Joverfelt.net page load time and found that the first response time was 551 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joverfelt.net performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joverfelt.net

551 ms

webfont.js

200 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

227 ms

318 ms

css

401 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Joverfelt.net, 26% (7 requests) were made to S0.wp.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (551 ms) belongs to the original domain Joverfelt.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.5 kB (12%)

Content Size

933.3 kB

After Optimization

816.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Joverfelt.net main page is 933.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 712.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 103.6 kB

  • Original 139.6 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB
  • After compression 36.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 712.6 kB
  • After minification 708.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. J Overfelt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 75.1 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 66.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 175 B

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joverfelt.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of J Overfelt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

joverfelt.net

joverfelt.net

551 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

200 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

227 ms

318 ms

css

css

401 ms

258 ms

284 ms

global.css

global.css

283 ms

363 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

192 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

281 ms

361 ms

w.js

w.js

207 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

119 ms

css

css

178 ms

cropped-magney-1-1.jpg

cropped-magney-1-1.jpg

180 ms

joverfelt.net

joverfelt.net

494 ms

cropped-iconfinder_258-tree_2124155-1.png

cropped-iconfinder_258-tree_2124155-1.png

479 ms

cropped-magney-1-1.jpg

cropped-magney-1-1.jpg

383 ms

g.gif

g.gif

191 ms

hovercard.min.css

hovercard.min.css

152 ms

services.min.css

services.min.css

154 ms

remote-login.php

remote-login.php

195 ms

g.gif

g.gif

127 ms

g.gif

g.gif

123 ms

actionbar.css

actionbar.css

5 ms

actionbar.js

actionbar.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

joverfelt.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

joverfelt.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

joverfelt.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joverfelt.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joverfelt.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

joverfelt.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of J Overfelt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: