Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

joydare.com

Joy Dare – Finding Joy In Everyday Life

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

3.1 sec

joydare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit joydare.com now to see the best up-to-date Joy Dare content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joydare.com

Wife. Mother. Writer

Visit joydare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joydare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joydare.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joydare.com

117 ms

amberravatsaas.com

1553 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

39 ms

style.css

59 ms

styles.css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 208 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Joydare.com, 14% (30 requests) were made to Amberravatsaas.com and 10% (21 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (32%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Joydare.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 315.5 kB

  • Original 371.0 kB
  • After minification 369.5 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 315.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joy Dare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 338.9 kB

  • Original 524.4 kB
  • After minification 500.4 kB
  • After compression 185.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 338.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 821.1 kB

  • Original 937.0 kB
  • After minification 917.6 kB
  • After compression 115.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joydare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 821.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (52%)

Requests Now

192

After Optimization

93

The browser has sent 192 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joy Dare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 74 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

joydare.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

joydare.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

joydare.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joydare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joydare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Joy Dare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: