710 ms in total
31 ms
570 ms
109 ms
Click here to check amazing JQTouch content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jqtouch.com
Zepto/jQuery plugin for mobile web development on the iPhone, Android, iPod Touch, and other forward-thinking devices.
Visit jqtouch.comWe analyzed Jqtouch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 679 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
jqtouch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value3.5 s
65/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value550 ms
53/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
31 ms
16 ms
7 ms
8 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jqtouch.com, 31% (11 requests) were made to Jqtjs.com and 17% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (307 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 215.3 kB (51%)
422.3 kB
207.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Jqtouch.com main page is 422.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 223.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, JQTouch needs image optimization as it can save up to 160.9 kB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (43%)
28
16
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JQTouch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jqtouch.com
31 ms
jqtjs.com
16 ms
jqt.css
7 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
jquery.tweet.js
19 ms
addthis_widget.js
16 ms
forkme_left_white_ffffff.png
41 ms
plusone.js
43 ms
widgets.js
68 ms
ga.js
25 ms
bg_page.gif
20 ms
iphone4.png
68 ms
bg_band.gif
39 ms
btn_dl_all.png
44 ms
bg_preview.png
44 ms
input.png
44 ms
signup.png
44 ms
senchalabs.png
72 ms
all.js
67 ms
96538448
179 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
44 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
75 ms
fastbutton
71 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
153 ms
all.js
36 ms
user_timeline.json
90 ms
postmessageRelay
104 ms
developers.google.com
307 ms
settings
74 ms
3604799710-postmessagerelay.js
23 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
10 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
22 ms
embeds
22 ms
tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html
31 ms
jqtouch.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
jqtouch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jqtouch.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jqtouch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jqtouch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jqtouch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JQTouch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: