1.9 sec in total
292 ms
1.5 sec
88 ms
Visit jrps.in now to see the best up-to-date Jrps content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jrps.in
We are pioneers in writing and publication of research papers in ugc-care, google scholar, scopus, ieee indexed journals. We organize national/ international seminars and conferences We help in writin...
Visit jrps.inWe analyzed Jrps.in page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
jrps.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
292 ms
403 ms
98 ms
193 ms
383 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Jrps.in, 9% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (403 ms) belongs to the original domain Jrps.in.
Page size can be reduced by 54.4 kB (17%)
322.7 kB
268.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Jrps.in main page is 322.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 240.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jrps needs image optimization as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 261 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 268 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jrps.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (25%)
20
15
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jrps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jrps.in
292 ms
jrps.in
403 ms
jrps_grid.css
98 ms
index.css
193 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
383 ms
wb.overlay.min.js
287 ms
wb.drilldownmenu.min.js
286 ms
js
89 ms
1%20main.png
191 ms
icon-home-author.png
99 ms
RSS.png
99 ms
FACE%20BOOK.png
98 ms
TWITTER%20copy.png
96 ms
thomson.jpg
287 ms
Google_Scholar_logo_2015.PNG
192 ms
doicrossref.jpg
194 ms
100X100%20with%20outer%20glow.png
193 ms
peer%20reviewed%20logo.png
380 ms
impact%20factor.png
286 ms
js
73 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
collect
13 ms
jrps.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jrps.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jrps.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jrps.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jrps.in main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
jrps.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jrps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: