3.9 sec in total
371 ms
3 sec
504 ms
Click here to check amazing Js Rack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about js-rack.com
Jiangsu Fangkun Shelf manufacture Co., Ltd. is a professional and leading manufacturer to produce all kinds of pallet racking ,warehouse rack,Drive in rack, Heavy duty rack,shuttle racks and so on . W...
Visit js-rack.comWe analyzed Js-rack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 371 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
js-rack.com performance score
371 ms
518 ms
137 ms
376 ms
302 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Js-rack.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Pc15.one-all.com and 1% (1 request) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Js-rack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 103.9 kB (3%)
3.3 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Js-rack.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Js Rack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 914 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Js-rack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 914 B or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (20%)
74
59
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Js Rack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
js-rack.com
371 ms
www.js-rack.com
518 ms
common.css
137 ms
jquery.js
376 ms
common.js
302 ms
translator.js
287 ms
jquery.autocomplete.min.js
287 ms
jquery.autocomplete.css
299 ms
statitics.js
508 ms
Browser-detection-en.js
509 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
382 ms
jquery.event.drag-1.5.min.js
356 ms
jquery.touchSlider.js
358 ms
tools.min.js
372 ms
owl.carousel.js
373 ms
gun2.js
425 ms
thickbox.js
431 ms
thickbox.css
458 ms
addthis_widget.js
22 ms
skypeCheck.js
40 ms
gtm.js
84 ms
574515f9419b5.jpg
147 ms
topemail.jpg
114 ms
searchbtn.jpg
111 ms
leftbtn.png
110 ms
5ec3725b397fc.jpg
605 ms
57d0cf88bee83.jpg
205 ms
57464253cb027.jpg
445 ms
57d0d1588984f.jpg
326 ms
57d0cb3ddff03.jpg
368 ms
574cfc0607142.jpg
408 ms
57d0d6d19502d.jpg
496 ms
57d0d4db71ddd.jpg
439 ms
57d0f06766c49.jpg
618 ms
57d0d8d7c03b2.jpg
510 ms
64fe88386b514.JPG
1082 ms
rightbtn.png
593 ms
157527211949.png
767 ms
147305493070.jpg
785 ms
147289268237.jpg
805 ms
147280547991.jpg
799 ms
147271920296.jpg
802 ms
147271818196.jpg
853 ms
147261900283.jpg
930 ms
147261101718.jpg
927 ms
14726106143.jpg
927 ms
147261041840.jpg
960 ms
147253275728.jpg
940 ms
147245636094.jpg
1022 ms
147245369736.jpg
1023 ms
150122860456.jpg
1017 ms
video.jpg
1026 ms
ewm.jpg
1030 ms
weixin.jpg
1113 ms
bottom_f.jpg
1171 ms
searchbg.jpg
1103 ms
5ec36fe517505.jpg
1304 ms
5ec370973dc9f.jpg
1151 ms
574cfabecc62a.jpg
1200 ms
btn1.png
1048 ms
btn2.png
1055 ms
classbg.jpg
947 ms
indextitlebg.png
964 ms
index_left.png
925 ms
index_right.png
904 ms
servicebg.jpg
1005 ms
indexmainbg.jpg
926 ms
index_left2.png
939 ms
index_right2.png
854 ms
add.jpg
912 ms
contact.jpg
900 ms
r_email.png
751 ms
r_inquiry.png
732 ms
r_ewm.png
720 ms
r_skype.png
792 ms
r_whats.png
814 ms
js-rack.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Js-rack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Js-rack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
js-rack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Js Rack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: