2.2 sec in total
52 ms
2.1 sec
58 ms
Welcome to jt2.com homepage info - get ready to check JT2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about jt2.com
JT2 integrates claims administration with risk control solutions to meet your business needs. Located in Oakland and serving all of California.
Visit jt2.comWe analyzed Jt2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
jt2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
52 ms
38 ms
32 ms
737 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jt2.com, 34% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 785.9 kB (64%)
1.2 MB
435.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Jt2.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 578.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 467.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 467.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JT2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 318.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.3 kB or 55% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (36%)
28
18
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JT2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jt2.com
52 ms
minified.js
38 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
737 ms
thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js
71 ms
main.4a2d1e74.bundle.min.js
72 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
22 ms
lodash.min.js
71 ms
react.production.min.js
70 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
71 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
72 ms
46ecc3_de1c383289114a499ad95f59ba8830fb~mv2.jpg
412 ms
5bfb6f_a463284fd84145f292a32dc0f0e0cc31.jpg
414 ms
5bfb6f_bb013bf1966340ceb9a576d68aa42273.jpg
415 ms
46ecc3_f08eafd11236468dacff513da15906e6~mv2_d_1700_2200_s_2.webp
601 ms
46ecc3_f08eafd11236468dacff513da15906e6~mv2_d_1700_2200_s_2.webp
600 ms
46ecc3_d5452fdc345a47d0ae897d815604dace~mv2.jpg
610 ms
46ecc3_f66fa3d5dbe34055ae03dd858ccba8e9~mv2_d_2448_2448_s_4_2.jpg
606 ms
46ecc3_66df68152ca5441dad8194c11032845b~mv2.jpg
612 ms
46ecc3_930972dad1064ab8a255303061a3af84~mv2.jpg
624 ms
46ecc3_cf028850cae14b8e9f405983eeb7c09a~mv2.jpg
740 ms
StopFraud.jpg
717 ms
5bfb6f_c9a631e8e43443cb9d7ad97133d9d83d.jpg
607 ms
dbbdc91820535cbbeb0664011cb93255.png
609 ms
bundle.min.js
62 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
36 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
36 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
36 ms
120 ms
113 ms
115 ms
112 ms
109 ms
106 ms
148 ms
146 ms
146 ms
143 ms
146 ms
143 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
18 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
5 ms
jt2.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jt2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jt2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jt2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jt2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jt2.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JT2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: