1.7 sec in total
121 ms
1.2 sec
384 ms
Click here to check amazing JT Thorpe content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jtthorpe.com
Our Comprehensive Softcraft Solutions At JT THORPE, we offer a full range of softcraft solutions to meet your unique needs. From installation and maintenanc ...
Visit jtthorpe.comWe analyzed Jtthorpe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
jtthorpe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value1,810 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
121 ms
22 ms
32 ms
35 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Jtthorpe.com, 20% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (426 ms) belongs to the original domain Jtthorpe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 204.0 kB (9%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Jtthorpe.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 179.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JT Thorpe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jtthorpe.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 88 (92%)
96
8
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JT Thorpe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jtthorpe.com
121 ms
style.min.css
22 ms
styles.css
32 ms
style.css
35 ms
style.css
29 ms
plugins.min.css
45 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
29 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
41 ms
modules.min.css
59 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
style.min.css
45 ms
ionicons.min.css
48 ms
style.css
79 ms
style.css
80 ms
simple-line-icons.css
77 ms
dripicons.css
76 ms
blog.min.css
81 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
85 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
84 ms
woocommerce-responsive.min.css
82 ms
style_dynamic.css
87 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
106 ms
js_composer.min.css
92 ms
css
35 ms
pum-site-styles.css
87 ms
jquery.min.js
106 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
106 ms
js
85 ms
css
72 ms
flexslider.min.css
104 ms
lightbox.min.css
105 ms
rs6.css
265 ms
hooks.min.js
281 ms
i18n.min.js
283 ms
player-static.js
281 ms
index.js
282 ms
index.js
280 ms
rbtools.min.js
293 ms
rs6.min.js
295 ms
core.min.js
293 ms
tabs.min.js
276 ms
accordion.min.js
271 ms
datepicker.min.js
274 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
273 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
272 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
264 ms
CSSPlugin.min.js
259 ms
Chart.min.js
300 ms
EasePack.min.js
258 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
256 ms
TimelineLite.min.js
229 ms
TweenLite.min.js
227 ms
absoluteCounter.js
227 ms
bootstrapCarousel.js
225 ms
counter.js
225 ms
easypiechart.js
223 ms
fluidvids.min.js
225 ms
jquery.appear.js
221 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
259 ms
css
22 ms
jquery.event.move.js
257 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
257 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
240 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
238 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
272 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
272 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
270 ms
fullscreen-menu-background-image.jpg
246 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
148 ms
footer-background-img.jpg
391 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff
131 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff
324 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff
358 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff
359 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff
358 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
359 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff
360 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff
362 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff
361 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
362 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
363 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
364 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
366 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
364 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
365 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
367 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
367 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
368 ms
jquery.plugin.js
94 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
93 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
110 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
109 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
110 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
99 ms
jquery.zcountdown.min.js
98 ms
modernizr.custom.85257.js
99 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
322 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
322 ms
parallax.min.js
319 ms
select2.min.js
321 ms
skrollr.js
318 ms
slick.min.js
319 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
339 ms
modules.min.js
338 ms
blog.min.js
417 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
336 ms
like.js
338 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
335 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
410 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
411 ms
lightbox.min.js
410 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
412 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
410 ms
petrochemical-chemical-banner-min-scaled.jpeg
426 ms
dummy.png
424 ms
refractory.png
425 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
288 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
288 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
54 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
56 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
55 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
56 ms
JT-Thrope-Logo.svg
54 ms
jtthorpe.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jtthorpe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jtthorpe.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jtthorpe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jtthorpe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jtthorpe.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JT Thorpe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: