3.4 sec in total
537 ms
2.4 sec
392 ms
Visit julesmorgan.com now to see the best up-to-date Julesmorgan content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about julesmorgan.com
How do you want to be photographed? Are you celebrating a milestone, new chapter or transition in your life? Do you need an updated family portrait? Looking to update your headshot or visual image for...
Visit julesmorgan.comWe analyzed Julesmorgan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
julesmorgan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value4,060 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.379
28/100
15%
Value9.3 s
32/100
10%
537 ms
209 ms
614 ms
495 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Julesmorgan.com, 47% (24 requests) were made to Cdn.filestackcontent.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) belongs to the original domain Julesmorgan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 27.6 kB (32%)
86.5 kB
58.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Julesmorgan.com main page is 86.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 55.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)
17
7
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julesmorgan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.julesmorgan.com
537 ms
css
209 ms
semantic.min-72be29f7497da8ca89c89192a4dc80e3.css
614 ms
application-d68677cfc0f865b0b67f36f1fb606a3a.css
495 ms
DU80tcuREl0YbTBxj2SA
184 ms
email-decode.min.js
194 ms
jquery.min.js
204 ms
application-876abb1d2cb489e837813f18f0626dad.js
195 ms
js
226 ms
jules-morgan-logo-9a1001d83bf36ea641507df23ebe4a7c.png
664 ms
jmp-heart-704307a8ef093aa3ee2332e6f8e7b0b3.png
188 ms
keVxmM4XRsyfYzslLhWy
166 ms
4zZ0hJWBRaC6ErDlMK5i
165 ms
gawsEhZ5R1ma2asBB6D8
166 ms
xUf2zl3JRA2XmSCGEcHS
166 ms
siYdqbtNSLKLq2bY5Shg
165 ms
kaheLwUCQrqIBGIs7ubj
167 ms
bsRA0OCkSmO9K46R83X1
166 ms
kYBPCQ1GSludEvPyjuJQ
169 ms
fnxmAXuqSjqxbkVtACdU
169 ms
VOujHIXRSuaMJ4pMc982
168 ms
nvv7zA00QfcykhamjRfA
169 ms
GjlXfXBOS0SDe3uWxusV
169 ms
xKaRQ2C8TPiKW81MxeKb
168 ms
photoswipe.css
427 ms
default-skin.css
459 ms
style.css
458 ms
css
47 ms
fnxmAXuqSjqxbkVtACdU
123 ms
ajax-loader-c5cd7f5300576ab4c88202b42f6ded62.gif
548 ms
DU80tcuREl0YbTBxj2SA
72 ms
keVxmM4XRsyfYzslLhWy
71 ms
4zZ0hJWBRaC6ErDlMK5i
71 ms
gawsEhZ5R1ma2asBB6D8
70 ms
xUf2zl3JRA2XmSCGEcHS
70 ms
siYdqbtNSLKLq2bY5Shg
69 ms
kaheLwUCQrqIBGIs7ubj
70 ms
bsRA0OCkSmO9K46R83X1
70 ms
kYBPCQ1GSludEvPyjuJQ
69 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
59 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
97 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
161 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
192 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
192 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
193 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
196 ms
icomoon-2d1c5f7b29f47ff4a9a28124060c3638.ttf
446 ms
slick-b7c9e1e479de3b53f1e4e30ebac2403a.woff
414 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
collect
37 ms
collect
71 ms
julesmorgan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
julesmorgan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
julesmorgan.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julesmorgan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julesmorgan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
julesmorgan.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Julesmorgan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: