Tools & Wizards About Us
juliadates.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

juliadates.com

JuliaDates

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

603 ms

juliadates.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Julia Dates content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about juliadates.com

JuliaDates

Visit juliadates.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Juliadates.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

juliadates.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

juliadates.com

53 ms

en

170 ms

jquery.min.js

87 ms

sentry.3b47be44f77b7417ad20.js

87 ms

app.59caf7540f70965b202c.js

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Juliadates.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) belongs to the original domain Juliadates.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

330.9 kB

After Optimization

295.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Juliadates.com main page is 330.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 191.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

  • Original 48.6 kB
  • After minification 42.6 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 191.6 kB
  • After minification 191.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julia Dates images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 35 B

  • Original 90.7 kB
  • After minification 90.7 kB
  • After compression 90.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Juliadates.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julia Dates. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

juliadates.com

juliadates.com

53 ms

en

en

170 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

87 ms

sentry.3b47be44f77b7417ad20.js

sentry.3b47be44f77b7417ad20.js

87 ms

app.59caf7540f70965b202c.js

app.59caf7540f70965b202c.js

100 ms

js

js

109 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

130 ms

app_juliadates.5e2e06839adf12cd9386.css

app_juliadates.5e2e06839adf12cd9386.css

30 ms

yii.js

yii.js

86 ms

yii.validation.js

yii.validation.js

86 ms

yii.activeForm.js

yii.activeForm.js

87 ms

logo-juliadates.svg

logo-juliadates.svg

53 ms

index-form_bg-1.jpg

index-form_bg-1.jpg

55 ms

index_best_sprite.jpg

index_best_sprite.jpg

55 ms

index_cta-img.jpg

index_cta-img.jpg

54 ms

Roboto-Regular.woff

Roboto-Regular.woff

49 ms

Roboto-Medium.woff

Roboto-Medium.woff

47 ms

Roboto-Light.woff

Roboto-Light.woff

293 ms

Roboto-Bold.woff

Roboto-Bold.woff

637 ms

icomoon-74.woff

icomoon-74.woff

17 ms

Accessibility Review

juliadates.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

juliadates.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

juliadates.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Juliadates.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Juliadates.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

juliadates.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Julia Dates. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: