Tools & Wizards About Us
julianbartrom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

julianbartrom.com

Customized engagment rings Auckland,Custom Jewellers Auckland nz

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

815 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

julianbartrom.com screenshot

About Website

Visit julianbartrom.com now to see the best up-to-date Julianbartrom content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about julianbartrom.com

Get Customized engagement rings auckland,custom made jewllers in auckland,nz from Julian Bartrom,an award winning jewellery designer.

Visit julianbartrom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Julianbartrom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 815 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julianbartrom.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

julianbartrom.com

815 ms

gtm.js

93 ms

0b7fd24e-986b-4126-a45a-9d72d7aa6dbe.js

110 ms

reset.css

197 ms

bootstrap.css

394 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Julianbartrom.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Julianbartrom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.2 kB (33%)

Content Size

301.4 kB

After Optimization

201.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Julianbartrom.com main page is 301.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 137.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 27.8 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julianbartrom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 117.4 kB
  • After minification 117.4 kB
  • After compression 114.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 76.0 kB

  • Original 137.3 kB
  • After minification 137.1 kB
  • After compression 61.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julianbartrom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 55% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (83%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julianbartrom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

julianbartrom.com

julianbartrom.com

815 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

93 ms

0b7fd24e-986b-4126-a45a-9d72d7aa6dbe.js

0b7fd24e-986b-4126-a45a-9d72d7aa6dbe.js

110 ms

reset.css

reset.css

197 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

394 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.css

jquery.fullPage.min.css

258 ms

slick.css

slick.css

589 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

786 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

789 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

592 ms

latest.css

latest.css

595 ms

style.css

style.css

595 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

791 ms

player.js

player.js

73 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

59 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

987 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

796 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

60 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

795 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

981 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.js

jquery.fullPage.min.js

264 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

69 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

979 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

1174 ms

pointer_events_polyfill.js

pointer_events_polyfill.js

981 ms

julianbartrom.js

julianbartrom.js

1026 ms

jb_02.js

jb_02.js

1180 ms

js

js

108 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

1179 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

1180 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

1194 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

1195 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

15 ms

880398442

880398442

211 ms

880397146

880397146

198 ms

julianbartrom-logo.png

julianbartrom-logo.png

375 ms

jb_arrow_white.png

jb_arrow_white.png

376 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

376 ms

api.js

api.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

julianbartrom.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

julianbartrom.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

julianbartrom.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julianbartrom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Julianbartrom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

julianbartrom.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Julianbartrom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: