6.5 sec in total
177 ms
6.2 sec
185 ms
Visit juliemorrell.com now to see the best up-to-date Julie Morrell content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about juliemorrell.com
Visit juliemorrell.comWe analyzed Juliemorrell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
juliemorrell.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value4.1 s
48/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.835
4/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
177 ms
4547 ms
30 ms
184 ms
334 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Juliemorrell.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Juliemorrell.com.
Page size can be reduced by 198.1 kB (33%)
608.9 kB
410.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Juliemorrell.com main page is 608.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 301.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julie Morrell images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 66.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Juliemorrell.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 75.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (67%)
30
10
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julie Morrell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
juliemorrell.com
177 ms
www.juliemorrell.com
4547 ms
css
30 ms
style.css
184 ms
style.responsive.css
334 ms
style.min.css
410 ms
front-flex.min.css
335 ms
font-awesome.min.css
30 ms
jquery.min.js
417 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
340 ms
sow-slider-default-6d39609536fd-20.css
361 ms
slider.css
512 ms
comment-reply.min.js
513 ms
script.js
520 ms
script.responsive.js
539 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
588 ms
jquery.slider.min.js
595 ms
jquery.cycle.swipe.min.js
691 ms
header.jpg
335 ms
object187456762.png
266 ms
object1087913099.png
286 ms
footerfacebookicon.png
335 ms
footertwittericon.png
342 ms
youtubeicon.png
439 ms
newheader.jpg
673 ms
julie_morrell_mft.jpg
465 ms
woman_sunset.jpg
513 ms
cleansober.jpg
514 ms
postbullets.png
522 ms
footer.png
618 ms
FeVfS0NQpLYgnjVRDw.ttf
70 ms
verified-seal-cb.min.js
15 ms
83302
473 ms
slider.woff
181 ms
juliemorrell.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
juliemorrell.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
juliemorrell.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Juliemorrell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Juliemorrell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
juliemorrell.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Julie Morrell. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: