Tools & Wizards About Us
julmar.es screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

julmar.es

Julmar Inmobiliaria |

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

508 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

211 ms

julmar.es screenshot

About Website

Visit julmar.es now to see the best up-to-date Julmar content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about julmar.es

Gestion de Asesoramiento Inmobiliario Julmar, Compra Venta, Alquileres, Rusticas, Parcelas, Terrenos, buñol, chiva, cheste, macastre, godelleta, turis, alborache, valencia, siete aguas, Servicios de A...

Visit julmar.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Julmar.es page load time and found that the first response time was 508 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julmar.es performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.636

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

julmar.es

508 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

238 ms

paypal-ipn-for-wordpress-public.css

284 ms

jquery.dataTables.css

211 ms

dataTables.responsive.css

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Julmar.es, 8% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.datatables.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Julmar.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.1 kB (69%)

Content Size

242.1 kB

After Optimization

75.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Julmar.es main page is 242.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 106.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 75.1 kB

  • Original 87.1 kB
  • After minification 63.4 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.8 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julmar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 76.1 kB

  • Original 106.9 kB
  • After minification 91.6 kB
  • After compression 30.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 18.4 kB
  • After minification 15.9 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julmar.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (88%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julmar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

julmar.es

julmar.es

508 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

238 ms

paypal-ipn-for-wordpress-public.css

paypal-ipn-for-wordpress-public.css

284 ms

jquery.dataTables.css

jquery.dataTables.css

211 ms

dataTables.responsive.css

dataTables.responsive.css

270 ms

style.css

style.css

276 ms

css

css

404 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

276 ms

lightslider.min.css

lightslider.min.css

278 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

282 ms

swipebox.min.css

swipebox.min.css

437 ms

select2.css

select2.css

470 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

488 ms

animate.css

animate.css

479 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

471 ms

main.css

main.css

587 ms

theme.css

theme.css

609 ms

style.css

style.css

645 ms

custom.css

custom.css

646 ms

style.css

style.css

648 ms

child-custom.css

child-custom.css

668 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

881 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

797 ms

jquery.dataTables.min.js

jquery.dataTables.min.js

427 ms

dataTables.responsive.js

dataTables.responsive.js

362 ms

paypal-ipn-for-wordpress-public.js

paypal-ipn-for-wordpress-public.js

834 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

827 ms

jquery.swipebox.min.js

jquery.swipebox.min.js

845 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

1092 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

1285 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1149 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

1059 ms

transition.js

transition.js

1058 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1077 ms

modal.js

modal.js

1275 ms

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

1270 ms

jquery.placeholder.min.js

jquery.placeholder.min.js

1307 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1314 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

1359 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

1461 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

1476 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

1201 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

1186 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

1258 ms

inspiry-search-form.js

inspiry-search-form.js

1301 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1378 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1402 ms

banner.png

banner.png

1008 ms

icon-search.svg

icon-search.svg

827 ms

widget-list-bullet.svg

widget-list-bullet.svg

1030 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

833 ms

APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjrpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjrpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

167 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1655 ms

Accessibility Review

julmar.es accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

julmar.es best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

julmar.es SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julmar.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Julmar.es main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

julmar.es

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Julmar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: