3.1 sec in total
81 ms
2.1 sec
887 ms
Welcome to julvia.com homepage info - get ready to check Julvia best content right away, or after learning these important things about julvia.com
SUTUREGARD®, the most advanced minimally invasive wound closure & complex linear closure technology, that reduces the need for skin flaps, skin grafts, or second intent healing of skin cancer (BCC, SC...
Visit julvia.comWe analyzed Julvia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
julvia.com performance score
81 ms
195 ms
403 ms
75 ms
140 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Julvia.com, 73% (64 requests) were made to Suturegard.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (631 ms) relates to the external source Suturegard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (80%)
2.6 MB
517.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Julvia.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julvia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 747.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 747.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julvia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (74%)
77
20
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julvia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
julvia.com
81 ms
suturegard.com
195 ms
suturegard.com
403 ms
gtm.js
75 ms
default.css
140 ms
SearchSkinObjectPreview.css
226 ms
skin.css
346 ms
homepage02.css
308 ms
container.css
340 ms
portal.css
299 ms
home.css
302 ms
css
56 ms
css
105 ms
jquery.mmenu.css
318 ms
jquery.js
525 ms
jquery-migrate.js
361 ms
jquery-ui.js
460 ms
WebResource.axd
359 ms
ScriptResource.axd
442 ms
ScriptResource.axd
398 ms
dnn.js
441 ms
dnn.modalpopup.js
440 ms
dnncore.js
449 ms
dnngo-ThemePlugin.js
491 ms
SearchSkinObjectPreview.js
486 ms
dnn.servicesframework.js
486 ms
font-awesome.min.css
86 ms
Suturegard_SiteLogo.png
488 ms
script.js
503 ms
custom.js
512 ms
SutureIMG_DS.png
604 ms
HemigardHomePage.png
558 ms
SG_How1.png
513 ms
SG_How2.png
526 ms
SG_How3.png
550 ms
SG_How4.png
555 ms
Step1-HG.png
569 ms
Step2-HG.png
579 ms
Step3-HG.png
605 ms
Step4-HG.png
605 ms
FooterLogo.png
606 ms
LocationIcon.png
624 ms
PhoneIcon.png
631 ms
analytics.js
81 ms
insight.min.js
127 ms
f01bb1b9885c4f51c310ff411.js
118 ms
fbevents.js
93 ms
platform.js
125 ms
EmailIcon.png
564 ms
collect
30 ms
1151282178536364
184 ms
collect
95 ms
insight.beta.min.js
36 ms
ga-audiences
49 ms
bootstrap.css
399 ms
shortcodes.css
387 ms
accordions.css
377 ms
alerts-message.css
415 ms
animated-columns.css
416 ms
botton.css
418 ms
dg-title.css
418 ms
clients.css
422 ms
tabs.css
433 ms
pages.css
406 ms
27 ms
icon-box.css
355 ms
pricing.css
375 ms
portfolios.css
388 ms
imagebox.css
384 ms
testimonial.css
393 ms
chart.css
350 ms
promo-boxes.css
357 ms
flip-box.css
366 ms
dividers.css
375 ms
ourteam.css
366 ms
blog.css
367 ms
11 ms
Body_bg_2.png
283 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc9iB85tU1Q.ttf
57 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8GBs5tU1Q.ttf
58 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8aBc5tU1Q.ttf
266 ms
pe03MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cc8-BM5tU1Q.ttf
267 ms
pe0qMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cce9I94.ttf
267 ms
HH-Float.jpg
212 ms
Home02PaneA-bg.jpg
211 ms
291 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
78 ms
pe01MImSLYBIv1o4X1M8cce4GwZuY1MIVw.ttf
77 ms
julvia.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julvia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julvia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
julvia.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Julvia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: