Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

julvia.com

Complex Linear Closure | Mohs Surgery Wound Closure | SUTUREGARD®

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

81 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

887 ms

julvia.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to julvia.com homepage info - get ready to check Julvia best content right away, or after learning these important things about julvia.com

SUTUREGARD®, the most advanced minimally invasive wound closure & complex linear closure technology, that reduces the need for skin flaps, skin grafts, or second intent healing of skin cancer (BCC, SC...

Visit julvia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Julvia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julvia.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

julvia.com

81 ms

suturegard.com

195 ms

suturegard.com

403 ms

gtm.js

75 ms

default.css

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Julvia.com, 73% (64 requests) were made to Suturegard.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (631 ms) relates to the external source Suturegard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (80%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

517.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Julvia.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 65.6 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 144.3 kB
  • After minification 142.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julvia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 747.5 kB

  • Original 929.0 kB
  • After minification 683.2 kB
  • After compression 181.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 747.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 172.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julvia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (74%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julvia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

julvia.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julvia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julvia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Julvia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: