Tools & Wizards About Us
jum-aerosol.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 42

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

jum-aerosol.com

aerosol can leak detector and FID hydrocarbon analyzer, J.U.M. Engineering Home

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

157 ms

jum-aerosol.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jum-aerosol.com now to see the best up-to-date Jum Aerosol content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jum-aerosol.com

J.U.M. for heated total hydrocarbon FID analyzer, heated non methane hydrocarbon analyzer and aerosol can leak tester for waterbath alternative

Visit jum-aerosol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jum-aerosol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jum-aerosol.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jum-aerosol.com

179 ms

adsbygoogle.js

66 ms

css

37 ms

user.js

45 ms

jquery.js

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Jum-aerosol.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) relates to the external source Stats.netsolads.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

211.6 kB

After Optimization

175.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jum-aerosol.com main page is 211.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 102.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 28.1 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 95 B

  • Original 75.0 kB
  • After minification 74.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jum Aerosol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 102.9 kB
  • After minification 102.9 kB
  • After compression 92.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jum-aerosol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (36%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jum Aerosol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jum-aerosol.com

jum-aerosol.com

179 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

66 ms

css

css

37 ms

user.js

user.js

45 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

130 ms

simplegallery.js

simplegallery.js

128 ms

photo_album.js

photo_album.js

128 ms

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

126 ms

template.css

template.css

51 ms

website.css

website.css

139 ms

11.css

11.css

138 ms

icwebsiteelement.css

icwebsiteelement.css

141 ms

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

145 ms

c.count

c.count

126 ms

167_JUM-LogoKleiner-01.jpg

167_JUM-LogoKleiner-01.jpg

140 ms

160_intro_bgr.jpg

160_intro_bgr.jpg

146 ms

160_Labor-01.jpg

160_Labor-01.jpg

174 ms

160_Aerosol-01.jpg

160_Aerosol-01.jpg

145 ms

645_earth-01.jpg

645_earth-01.jpg

146 ms

640_2nd_Bar.jpg

640_2nd_Bar.jpg

145 ms

jsconfig

jsconfig

5358 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

30 ms

header-bg_bgEditor_1293791119585.jpg

header-bg_bgEditor_1293791119585.jpg

43 ms

inner-bg.gif

inner-bg.gif

30 ms

footer-btm.png

footer-btm.png

45 ms

footer-bg.gif

footer-bg.gif

30 ms

print.css

print.css

24 ms

Accessibility Review

jum-aerosol.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

jum-aerosol.com best practices score

42

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jum-aerosol.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jum-aerosol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jum-aerosol.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

jum-aerosol.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jum Aerosol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: