1.6 sec in total
64 ms
1.5 sec
62 ms
Visit jumec.com now to see the best up-to-date Jumec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jumec.com
Jumec, Jumic, jumec construction, jumec constructions, Architectural Construction, 6 Bexley place, ottawa construction
Visit jumec.comWe analyzed Jumec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
jumec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value3,040 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value21.8 s
1/100
10%
64 ms
34 ms
34 ms
77 ms
502 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jumec.com, 33% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 21% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (786 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 361.0 kB (37%)
975.3 kB
614.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jumec.com main page is 975.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 443.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 342.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 342.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jumec needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jumec.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)
32
16
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jumec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jumec.com
64 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
34 ms
minified.js
34 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
77 ms
polyfill.min.js
502 ms
thunderbolt-commons.eb770ee8.bundle.min.js
65 ms
main.578f27a3.bundle.min.js
63 ms
lodash.min.js
66 ms
react.production.min.js
68 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
68 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
65 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
67 ms
93e549_f15916ce3b8b2fa4c5162196bbec8996.png
326 ms
695940_c3ec586d9bc0429db7e7e7dd89dc88e7.png
707 ms
695940_4c204676d23e48d4a7cc58033d3550a8.png
749 ms
695940_a6f0de6f1c1441abab2b4949ef3fe401.png
708 ms
695940_e05fd9543e2d4681bdf10fdf1443c435.png
706 ms
93e549_f15916ce3b8b2fa4c5162196bbec8996.png
705 ms
695940_c6e5944d5add478da471ef97d243dca3.png
707 ms
93e549_14016fbcb35b444fca8bf37d0cf04ed2.png
748 ms
695940_fb2156e12620423d8be8891c6c4ef2b5.jpg
758 ms
LAtest%20LOGO.jpg
757 ms
CCAB%20member%20logo-web.png
757 ms
GCAO%2050th%20logo%5B41295%5D.jpg
786 ms
MvnuPyLqSyc
202 ms
bundle.min.js
79 ms
9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
9 ms
97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aWz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
10 ms
cacc0862-f146-4746-92b1-60e6114a66c4.woff
8 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
9 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
9 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
9 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
79 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
81 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
80 ms
151 ms
144 ms
384 ms
382 ms
141 ms
140 ms
499 ms
493 ms
493 ms
493 ms
490 ms
www-player.css
36 ms
www-embed-player.js
63 ms
base.js
115 ms
ad_status.js
220 ms
QIgJXlTW_ocH5BKR4VvT459F7KnrK51w4wqraUAmDYI.js
157 ms
embed.js
54 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
53 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
57 ms
id
45 ms
Create
24 ms
qoe
12 ms
log_event
1 ms
jumec.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
jumec.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jumec.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jumec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jumec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jumec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jumec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: