22.2 sec in total
57 ms
20.5 sec
1.6 sec
Visit jupegan.com now to see the best up-to-date Jupegan content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jupegan.com
Discover real estate in Nigeria through a trusted company Jupegan Investment. Marketers of The Iconic Towers, Nautica Rise in V.I & Ikoyi
Visit jupegan.comWe analyzed Jupegan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 22.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
jupegan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value2,720 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value32.1 s
0/100
10%
57 ms
330 ms
80 ms
21 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Jupegan.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Jupegan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 745.2 kB (14%)
5.2 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Jupegan.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 168.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 573.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jupegan needs image optimization as it can save up to 573.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jupegan.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (78%)
85
19
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jupegan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jupegan.com
57 ms
jupegan.com
330 ms
js
80 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
21 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
59 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
42 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
46 ms
swiper.min.css
43 ms
post-5.css
36 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
36 ms
post-12.css
59 ms
post-7.css
62 ms
post-277.css
64 ms
ekiticons.css
75 ms
style.css
60 ms
css2
60 ms
main.min.css
65 ms
page-title.min.css
109 ms
elementor-frontend.min.css
82 ms
widget-styles.css
129 ms
widget-styles-pro.css
109 ms
responsive.css
105 ms
particles.css
107 ms
css
103 ms
fontawesome.min.css
123 ms
brands.min.css
126 ms
solid.min.css
125 ms
script.min.js
286 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
292 ms
jquery.min.js
291 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
303 ms
jarallax.js
328 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
152 ms
adsbygoogle.js
102 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
150 ms
animations.min.css
149 ms
elementskit-reset-button.css
150 ms
frontend-script.js
449 ms
widget-scripts.js
546 ms
anime.js
530 ms
parallax-frontend-scripts.js
544 ms
e-202434.js
52 ms
api.js
96 ms
main.js
604 ms
particles.min.js
538 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
650 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
704 ms
waypoints.min.js
699 ms
core.min.js
645 ms
frontend.min.js
690 ms
ekit-particles.js
705 ms
goodshare.min.js
791 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
19939 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
879 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
883 ms
hooks.min.js
883 ms
i18n.min.js
873 ms
frontend.min.js
952 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1050 ms
animate-circle.min.js
1040 ms
elementor.js
1051 ms
elementor.js
928 ms
swiper.min.js
1162 ms
elementskit-sticky-content.js
1146 ms
elementskit-reset-button.js
1200 ms
parallax-admin-scripts.js
1228 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1228 ms
fbevents.js
123 ms
jupegan-youtube-brand-logo-1.png
924 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2023-02-07-at-18.17.11.jpg
938 ms
5.jpg
950 ms
Autograph-phone.jpg
951 ms
3.jpg
965 ms
Nautica-Rise-Side-View-to-Ocean-1.png
971 ms
g2-residence-ikoyi-ultimate-in-l-2.jpg
977 ms
f09f8fa1-luxury-living-at-zi-2.jpg
938 ms
font
75 ms
font
493 ms
elementskit.woff
1373 ms
font
69 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
808 ms
eicons.woff
843 ms
Lekki-Atlantic-Miami-Waterfront-Lifstyle-inspired.gif
830 ms
8-768x1025.jpg
830 ms
Nautica-Rise-Side-View-to-Ocean-1-768x450.png
714 ms
proeprty-in-for-sale-in-Nigeria-768x576.jpg
711 ms
1h6e5bd3f
169 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
693 ms
oniru_beach-768x384.jpg
698 ms
balcony-view-of-Nautica-rise.png
1243 ms
Nautica-Rise-new-year.jpg
695 ms
g2-residence-ikoyi-ultimate-in-l.jpg
678 ms
recaptcha__en.js
87 ms
jupegan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
jupegan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
jupegan.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jupegan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jupegan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jupegan.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jupegan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: