Tools & Wizards About Us
jupitergem.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

jupitergem.com

JupiterGem: Exceptional Gems and Jewelry

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

928 ms

jupitergem.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jupitergem.com now to see the best up-to-date Jupiter Gem content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jupitergem.com

Choose From Over 5000 Exceptional Gemstones & Fine Rings Free FedEx! Find your Engagement Ring · Ships Within 24 Hours · Jewelry District LA

Visit jupitergem.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jupitergem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jupitergem.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.258

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jupitergem.com

53 ms

jupitergem.com

1585 ms

acima-credit.css

43 ms

pre-approval.css

43 ms

affirm-promo.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Jupitergem.com, 54% (40 requests) were made to Cdn.jupitergem.com and 18% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jupitergem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 302.6 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

862.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jupitergem.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 621.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 278.1 kB

  • Original 311.3 kB
  • After minification 194.1 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 117.2 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 278.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 229 B

  • Original 621.3 kB
  • After minification 621.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jupiter Gem images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 200.8 kB
  • After minification 200.8 kB
  • After compression 177.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 409 B

  • Original 31.4 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 31.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jupitergem.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (46%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jupiter Gem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jupitergem.com

jupitergem.com

53 ms

jupitergem.com

jupitergem.com

1585 ms

acima-credit.css

acima-credit.css

43 ms

pre-approval.css

pre-approval.css

43 ms

affirm-promo.css

affirm-promo.css

51 ms

button.css

button.css

51 ms

acima-credit.js

acima-credit.js

51 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

52 ms

pre-approval.js

pre-approval.js

64 ms

tapfiliate.js

tapfiliate.js

65 ms

requirejs-config.js

requirejs-config.js

62 ms

mixins.js

mixins.js

71 ms

klarna.js

klarna.js

67 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

161 ms

flickity.css

flickity.css

252 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

73 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

254 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

273 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

54 ms

swap.js

swap.js

70 ms

api.js

api.js

10 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

60 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

87 ms

hotjar-3100910.js

hotjar-3100910.js

175 ms

1banner.jpg

1banner.jpg

112 ms

custommade_banner.jpg

custommade_banner.jpg

109 ms

cant-find-300x250px_2020.jpg

cant-find-300x250px_2020.jpg

107 ms

alexandrite1_2.jpeg

alexandrite1_2.jpeg

108 ms

blue-sapphires.jpeg

blue-sapphires.jpeg

109 ms

emerald-gemstone.jpeg

emerald-gemstone.jpeg

109 ms

green-sapp.jpeg

green-sapp.jpeg

118 ms

morganites.jpeg

morganites.jpeg

109 ms

opals.jpeg

opals.jpeg

118 ms

orange-sapp.jpeg

orange-sapp.jpeg

118 ms

padparadscha-sapp.jpeg

padparadscha-sapp.jpeg

130 ms

paraiba-tourmalines.jpg

paraiba-tourmalines.jpg

116 ms

pink-sapp.jpeg

pink-sapp.jpeg

131 ms

ruby.jpeg

ruby.jpeg

130 ms

blue-star-sapp.jpeg

blue-star-sapp.jpeg

132 ms

spinel.jpeg

spinel.jpeg

130 ms

tsavorites.jpg

tsavorites.jpg

131 ms

tanzanite.jpeg

tanzanite.jpeg

135 ms

sapphire.jpeg

sapphire.jpeg

133 ms

topaz.jpeg

topaz.jpeg

132 ms

unique-gemstone.jpeg

unique-gemstone.jpeg

141 ms

yellow-sapp.jpeg

yellow-sapp.jpeg

135 ms

white-saphhires.jpeg

white-saphhires.jpeg

133 ms

gemstones-all400.jpg

gemstones-all400.jpg

139 ms

alexandrite-ring.jpeg

alexandrite-ring.jpeg

142 ms

amethyst-ring_1.jpeg

amethyst-ring_1.jpeg

141 ms

blue-sapphire-rings.jpeg

blue-sapphire-rings.jpeg

150 ms

padparadscha-sapphire-rings.jpeg

padparadscha-sapphire-rings.jpeg

149 ms

paraiba-ring.jpeg

paraiba-ring.jpeg

151 ms

pink-sapphire-rings.jpeg

pink-sapphire-rings.jpeg

152 ms

platinum-ring.jpeg

platinum-ring.jpeg

155 ms

ruby-rings.jpeg

ruby-rings.jpeg

153 ms

spinel-rings.jpeg

spinel-rings.jpeg

171 ms

tsavorite-ring.jpeg

tsavorite-ring.jpeg

167 ms

turmaline-ring.jpeg

turmaline-ring.jpeg

168 ms

unique-rings.jpeg

unique-rings.jpeg

165 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

209 ms

1h15bdjt4

1h15bdjt4

146 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

55 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

65 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

72 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

151 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

76 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

69 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

66 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

75 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

79 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

86 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

93 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

85 ms

Accessibility Review

jupitergem.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

jupitergem.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

jupitergem.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jupitergem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jupitergem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jupitergem.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jupiter Gem. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: